Draft talk:Shapr3D

Conflict of interest
I work for the company that builds the software written about here, I have done my best to keep the article brief and neutral while highlighting industry references that back up the notability of this software. I would be happy for any feedback, questions or further edits. Sebcachia (talk) 20:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Review by AXONOV
Per request made on [May 17, 2024, 14:11]. I don't think that this article meets WP:GNG well and there are many news among sources which is not good, but it might be moved into a mainspace if more people do agree on that. I would like to note that there are many Parasolid-based CAD-software & tools that don't necessarily need a separate article on them. If the article is ever moved to the mainspace, I would like to request to document program's file formats by using Infobox file format. It's also worth to try to reach out for his opinion. Best. AXO NOV (talk) ⚑ 23:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking a look @Alexander Davronov.
 * I added a few more sources. Shapr3D is mentioned in some of these sources alongside other newish CAD products like Onshape or Fusion360, both of which have their own articles. The sources used here are of similar quality to the ones used there too. I will see if I can find more sources.
 * Point noted about the file formats, and thanks for the tip to chat to @Wonderfl, I will see if he has further feedback or suggestions. Sebcachia (talk) 16:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)