Draft talk:St. John School

Thoughts on draft so far
The draft article is shaping up nicely. To:, : I have comments. As it stands, the draft has no sources listed. (1) The history section has a number of interesting details. Where did you learn of them? For an article, you will need to provide a reliable source, so that Wikipedia can vouch for the content. (2) Any sourcing to the school is considered a primary source, and is not always sufficient to consider something reliably sourced, especially when assessing whether the content is noteworthy. When editors are involved with the school, it's often hard for them to distinguish what is of interest to just the school and what is of interest to an encyclopedia reader. For example: "School runs from 9:00 to 3:00 with a lunch break from 12:00 to 12:45" is not noteworthy. The sections Tower gardens and Technology will need to be sourced eventually, and you might source it to material published by the school itself (primary source). The programs seem interesting and novel to me. If there are sources like news or other reporting that have taken note, that will help establish that the content is noteworthy. Best of luck. signed, Willondon (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)