Draft talk:Thomas Goodrich

Contested deletion
I contend that the article in question should not be subjected to speedy deletion for the following reasons, which are firmly rooted in Wikipedia's core content policies:


 * Notability and Verifiable Sources: The subject of the article, an author who has published almost a dozen books, clearly meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for authors. These works have been widely reviewed online, indicating significant coverage by independent sources (see Notability (people) and Notability (books)). The presence of such reviews in reputable publications or platforms can be easily verified, aligning with Wikipedia's verifiability policy.


 * Contribution to Knowledge and Public Discourse: The author's invitations to speak at symposiums due to his niche historical knowledge further underscore his notability and relevance. These engagements signify recognition by the academic and professional communities, further establishing the subject's prominence in his field.


 * Editorial Bias and Misuse of Deletion Policy: The request for speedy deletion, accompanied by biased comments from the submitter, suggests a potential misuse of Wikipedia's deletion policy for non-neutral purposes. Wikipedia's policies on Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:No personal attacks are clear that content disputes should not devolve into personal biases or attacks. The motivations behind the deletion request, especially if politically motivated, should not influence the article's standing, which ought to be judged solely on its adherence to Wikipedia's standards of notability and verifiability.

In light of these points, I argue for the retention and improvement of the article, rather than its deletion. Wikipedia's guidelines encourage the development of content that enriches the encyclopedia, provided it meets notability and neutrality criteria. The deletion of this article would not only disregard the notability of the author's contributions to literature and historical discourse but also undermine the principles of neutrality and fairness that Wikipedia espouses. --skarz (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)