Draft talk:Zamia floridana

I have been looking through the online database for more references but your topic is very narrow. I think you have all the meaningful references you can find already established. I saw that the article was declined, I think merging it could be a good idea. I do think though that you already specified that the differences in the names are because of morphological differences making your topic its own entity separate from Z. integrifolia. On another note, I still think that using the quotations are out of place for the wiki article but if Taylor approves I am sure its fine (referencing Multiple Cones topic). In the topic on effects of varying shade, I would change the word choice where you say "it seems . . ." I would say there is evidence. Just to amp up the overall tone of the article. A great article, hard to find anything wrong with it!