File:Gunnerkrigg SecondTreatise.jpg

Fair use rationale for use in Gunnerkrigg Court
It is believed that the use of this image, Gunnerkrigg_SecondTreatise.jpg, qualifies as fair use in the article Gunnerkrigg Court because:
 * No substitute is available under a free license, nor could one be created that would provide the same information.
 * This image is used solely for the purpose of illustrating the topic in question, and does not impair the copyright holder's ability to sell the original work in any way.
 * As this image is a single comic strip panel, it would not be useful for criminal reproduction of the entire strip, and therefore the use of this image does not pose a threat to the salability of the original.

WP:NFCC criteria

 * 1) No free equivalent. Yes.  As this is a unique work of art, no free equivalent exists
 * 2) Respect for commercial opportunities Yes.  As this is a single comic panel and is not recent, it cannot draw readers away from the webcomic's actual site.
 * 3) Minimal usage. Yes.  Other than the infobox image, this is the only non-free image from Gunnerkrigg Court in the article.
 * 4) Minimal extent of use. Yes.  Is only a single page from a webcomic, and is at low resolution so it cannot be printed or otherwise reproduced commercially.
 * 5) Previous publication. Yes.  Gunnerkrigg Court images are often displayed on the online reviews and interviews.  And this image was, of course, first published on the Gunnerkrigg Court website.
 * 6) Content. Yes.  Is used encyclopaedically to illustrate the creator's artistic style and narrative motifs.
 * 7) Media-specific policy. Yes.  See above.
 * 8) One-article minimum. Yes.  Is used in Gunnerkrigg Court.
 * 9) Significance. Yes.  Illustrates comic's artistic style and motifs, and significantly improves the article by breaking up what would otherwise be a wall of text.
 * 10) Restrictions on location. Yes.  This image is only used in an article.
 * 11) Image description page. Yes.  See above.
 * 1) Image description page. Yes.  See above.