File:John Bodkin Adams 1940s.jpg

Summary
Unknown author. Source - http://www.strangerinblood.co.uk/ - whose owner Pamela Cullen assures me it is public domain. If however it is copyrighted, then I believe it comes under fair use since it is of a famous man accused of murder. It is therefore of historical importance and its use here illustrates the article without infringing the rights of the owner, if they should exist. Malick78 09:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment--I do not see how the use of both this illustration and the one of him leaving the trial can be fair use. There's a possible reason whey either one might be, if used alone..DGG 19:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you link to that image? – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Quadell asserts that the limited use of this copyrighted image in Wikipedia articles directly pertaining to it is a fair use of the image, for the following reasons:
 * It depicts a deceased person. Therefore no new images of the subject can be created.
 * No free-license alternatives are available that convey the same information.
 * The image is no larger, and of no higher quality, than required for its use in articles.
 * It is used in Wikipedia only for educational purposes and is not used for profit.
 * Its use on Wikipedia does not compete with the copyright holder.
 * Its use on Wikipedia is not expected to decrease the value of the copyright to its holder.