File:PrinceConCovers.png

Summary
I know the author Sang Lee, personally, and he would have no problem with this image being used to augment the article PrinceCon under Fair Use doctrine. אמר  Steve Caruso   (desk/AMA)  •  Give Back Our Membership!  22:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Update: More criteria as requested:
 * "What proportion of the copyrighted work is used and to what degree does it compete with the copyright holder's usage?"
 * It is a low-resolution image of past convention cover art. It does not compete.
 * "If applicable, has the resolution been reduced from the original? In the case of music samples, has the quality been reduced from the original?"
 * See above.
 * What purpose does the image serve in the article? If applicable:
 * Is the image a logo, photograph, or box art for the main subject of the article?
 * Yes.
 * Is the image being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject or topic? (e.g., a corporate logo or the box art of a DVD)
 * Yes.
 * Does it illustrate the topic of the article? (e.g., a screen shot from a movie)
 * Yes.
 * Is it used for commentary on a particular topic? How?
 * N/A.
 * Why the subject can't be adequately conveyed by properly sourced text or using free content media.
 * There is no official free content visual media pertaining to the Con.


 * Any other information necessary to assist others in determining whether the use of this copyrighted work qualifies for fair use.
 * Sadly, the artist Sang Lee, passed on a few years back. It is well within his legacy for this image to be used to demonstrate the character of PrinceCon -- in any context -- as he was an avid participant in the Con who contributed his art freely as a matter of dedication for over a decade. The fact that this artwork is "copyrighted" in this context is a mere technicality.

אמר  Steve Caruso  14:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)