File talk:AntiWarRallyFeb162003.jpg

Current name
Are there any issues with the current picture name? Jayjg (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I renamed it because now that we include the name of the artist on the image page, I felt the image should not be associated with the old title. Anyone wanting to know more should e-mail me, given the BLP-related issues. SlimVirgin (talk) 23:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't believe this image is fair use. I see the ticket? But, I've left a voicemail message for whom I think is the artist of this poster, and am awaiting for a return call. What is an OTRS? And who gives that permission without the artist's name, for which that artist may have been commisioned to do the work despite the artist's politics and/or beliefs? ← Gee  ♥  Alice  08:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This has already been dealt with. OTRS is run by the Wikimedia Foundation. SlimVirgin  (talk) (contribs) 08:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I fear some harm may come to the artist by posting this image, for which he may have been commissioned to do the work despite his beliefs or politics. I'm very concerned about this. Perhaps because I have not heard from this person despite leaving many messages for, and it is not like him to not return my calls?!!! ← Gee  ♥  Alice  08:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You say you've left a message for the artist, so given that you know him and presumably his other work, you'll also know that your concern is misplaced. SlimVirgin  (talk) (contribs) 08:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I've just heard from the person and he said he was not the artist of the poster but does know who is. He also said that he's refused many commisions of this kind, before. Thank goodness. He said living in San Fransisco has many advantages, but a whole lot of "lunatics" of many kinds. Though, I still don't believe it should be in the lead of that article. Even though this person I just spoke with said whoever is arguing about this image being in the article is a lunatic too. As he believes it belongs in the article. So, I guess I better shut up now. :p ← Gee  ♥  Alice  06:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Very funny, yeah, yeah...
Now can someone fix this stupid joke on the photo? Shadowy Crafter 19:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Shadowy Crafter 02:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)