File talk:AtwaterDulcimer.jpg

Licensing email exchange
On 7/18/07, Ken Meltz  wrote: > >That sounds just fine to me, Garrett. Let me know if there's > >anything I need do but say okay to this...Ken Meltz > > >I'd recommend the GFDL/CC-BY-SA dual license: that's what I use for > >mine. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PikePlaceMarketCrowd.jpg > >for an example. By the terms of the Attribution-ShareAlike license, > >your name must be attached to any further reuse of the picture. > > > >On 7/18/07, Ken Meltz  wrote: > >>Which do you recommend? Do any of these identify the photographer by > >>name? Not interested in payment, obviously....Ken > >> > >>>Thanks, Ken! For the record, are you releasing the photo under the GNU > >>>Free Documentation License > >>>(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_License) > >>>and/or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 license > >>>(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/)? If those don't work > >>>for you, take a gander at > >>>http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing and let me know > >>>what does. > >>> > >>>On 7/17/07, Ken Meltz  wrote: > >>>>I'd be honored to be included in the article and, by all means, you have my > >>>>permission.