File talk:Bash screenshot.png

Screenshot is non-standard shot from bash
Why this screenshot of bash uses green colours instead of the usual white? :D OMG, it's like from those geek Hollywood movies. It doesn't make Linux any more consumer friendly to show off this kind of screenshot. :D


 * Thank you for your comment on this image. Please do not forget to sign your comments with four tildes. Also, this is not GameFaq, please refrain from overusing emoticons. It does not matter about the colour, in fact, a lot of Linux distros use green over black as it is easy to read. Why would Linux care about being 'consumer friendly'? Linux is free and opensource and does not marketing competition or anything else of that matter. Linux, in my opinion, is an operating system that beginner computer users should not simply switch. There should be minimalistic and simple, but complete, Linux distros that are aimed at the first time user, as it has so many advantages over Windows or Mac OS. Travis (talk) 07:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * He can type how he likes. 83.67.39.175 (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the thing to me that seems nonstandard for GNU/Linux here is that there is a /usr/portage directory. Isn't that a BSD thing? Swap (talk) 12:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops, I confused Gentoo's Portage with BSD's ports system. Never mind. Swap (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Screenshot has severe aliasing problems
The screenshot looks awfully blurred (which, given its resolution (615 × 599) does not come as a surprise). --89.15.175.94 (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)