File talk:Colonisation 1800.png

The Danish Colonial Empire
You should add the Danish colonial empire

Autralia + New Zealand
Please correct this map - the interior of Australia was still unknown in 1800. It wasn't until 1813 that the Blue Mountains only 48km to the west of Sydney had been crossed. A pink spot should be used to indicate the colony of Sydney. Similarly New Zealand's interior was still a mystery at this time.Provocateur (talk) 02:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

America?? Ottomans??
The united states was not in any conceivable way a colonial empire in 1800. I think a similar thing could be said about the Ottomans, but ill agree that that is open to debate. Seriously though take the US off there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.164.101.44 (talk) 21:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

If I would drink a bottle of Sherry, I will see that pink blob moving westwards. Let's hope it does not happen. (82.134.28.194 (talk) 11:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC))

Errors
Among other things, Patagonia was not occupied by Spain, and Louisiana was French at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.12.200.38 (talk) 17:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

→I am Disagree with  Patagonia was not occupied by Spain and with Louisiana was French at that time .;

→1a.- Patagonia was officially claim in 1535: "Primeramente, vos doi licencia i facultad a vos el dicho Pero Sancho de Hoz para que por nos, y en nuestro nombre i de la corona real de Castilla, podais navegar con los dichos navíos que ansí os ofreceis a hacer para la dicha mar del Sur, donde tienen las dichas gobernaciones los dichos marques don Francisco Pizarro, i adelantado don Diego de Almagro, i don Pedro de Mendoza, i Francisco de Camargo, hasta el dicho estrecho de Magallánes, i la tierra que está de la otra parte dél; y de ida o de vuelta, descubrireis toda aquella costa de la parte del dicho estrecho, sin que entreis en los límites i paraje de las islas i tierra que están dadas en gobernacion a otras personas a conquistar, e a gobernar, ni rescatar, sino fuese mantenimiento para sustentacion de la jente que lleváredes, con tanto que no toqueis en los límites y demarcacion del serenísimo rei de Portugal, nuestro hermano, ni en los Malucos, ni en los límites que, por la última contratacion y empeño, se dio al serenísimo rei. Item, vos prometemos que, hecho el dicho descubrimiento de la otra parte del dicho estrecho, o de alguna isla que no sea en paraje ajeno, os harémos la merced a vuestros servicios; i entre tanto que nos somos informados de lo que así descubriéredes, seais nuestro gobernador dello. (...) Fecha en Toledo a 24 días del mes de enero de 1539 años."

→1b.- along the coast of Patagonia many settlements were established, although some were unsuccessful, for example: Others spanish settlements in Patagonia:
 * The first expedition was commanded by Simon de Alcazaba Sotomayor who founded Caleta Hornos, in March 1535, in Gil Bay, 29 kilometers south of the present town of Camarones, with instructions of King Charles I of Spain to establish the Government of Nuevo León.
 * Puerto del Hambre (Port Famine) 1584
 * Nuestra Sra. del Pilar del Volcan
 * Carmen de Patagones
 * San Jose
 * Puerto Deseado since 1780
 * Nueva Colonia Floriblanca
 * Nombre de Jesus
 * Rey Don Felipe
 * Islas Malvinas (Falkland Islands) since 1770

→1c.- Spanish kings also accepted Indians like subject when they yielded vassalage for example Parlamento de Negrete (1793) (Parlamento de Negrete (1793)), to this contributed significantly the action of thousands of missionaries, for example: Misión del Nahuel Huapi (Chiloé Archipelago), since 1609; Misión del Neuquén (Neuquén), 1689-1694; Misión de los Desamparados de Tehuelches (Tehuelche people) 1749 ...;

→2.- Louisiana was spanish at that time, see (Third Treaty of San Ildefonso), and french on 21 March 1801 but under secrecy, and any case spanish forces do not left the colony till 1802 (On 15 October 1802, Charles IV published a Royal Bill in Barcelona that made effective the transfer of Louisiana, providing the withdrawal of the Spanish troops in the territory) --81.44.27.205 (talk) 03:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Did not the Batavic Republic share a borderline with France? Belgium did not even exist before 1830. If the map is correct, what happened to be in between? (82.134.28.194 (talk) 11:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)) Answer: 1800 is after the early part of the early phase of the Napoleonic wars, which redrew the map of Europe a number of times. In particular, this is after the Treaty of Campo Formio was signed in 1797, adding a lot of land to France (much of which was later redistributed after Napoleon's defeat). See the map at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Campo_Formio In 1800, Napoleon's army was occupying parts of Egypt and Syria, so perhaps this should be marked in also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_campaign_in_Egypt_and_Syria Sorry I don't have the time to do this myself, but I hope someone else will have a go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozzorro (talk • contribs) 07:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

N. Caucasus
It wasn't part of the Russian Empire yet in 1800, it was only added in the 1860s. It should be edited. --Yalens (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Turkey?
it's Ottoman Empire, multinational muslim people monarchy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.43.27.212 (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)