File talk:E1b1b1a1b V32.jpg

What do you suggests I should change?
The map was mainly meant as a visual aid like V13 has on the E1b1b1a page. Parts of it are estimates (Kenya, Southern Yemen) But the numbers are fairly accurate, even if 44% was found in Beja of Egypt that's still under 70% so their numbers are still accurate.

So basically you want me to lower the level in Sudan (Nile valley)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazi99 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * One other really basic thing is positioning. You seem to have Darfur in southern Egypt for example. It also seems strange to try to use so few data points to tell such a striking story. How did you pick the contours cut offs? A more neutral method for this might just be to type some percentages on a map?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

concerns with this file as it currently stands
Two of the sources named did not even test for V32. This seems to be bordering on original research. At the very least the striking contrasts being portrayed within some parts of Sudan seem unjustified. V32 was one of the most common haplogroups amongst the Beja according to Hassan et al, one of the cited studies. But Cruciani et al find highest levels in Egypt only around 44%.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)