File talk:Extended-protection-shackle.svg

Make the blue follow WikimediaUI guidelines
Can this by overriden by File:Extended-protection-shackle-wikimedia-blue.svg? The blue is not following WikimediaUI blue (See design.wikimedia.org) most of blues in the interface follow that, for example Template:Ambox. Ladsgroupoverleg 20:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Spintendo. This image is protected so only admins can override the upload. Why can't I use the template for this? Ladsgroupoverleg 11:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ❌ You will need to establish a larger consensus for this, as the current designs were the result of an 2018 RfC addressing colors and shading.  I'm not suggesting you need a new formal RfC, but you will need to discuss in a wider forum such as WP:VPR, Wikipedia talk:Protection policy, or the like. —  xaosflux  Talk 19:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying, I'm so happy they got redesigned and I'm so sad some are not following the color scheme we are trying to adapt. Thanks again Ladsgroupoverleg 21:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I think most of the original debate was over the "design" and not so much over the shade of colors - if you want to tackle this in toto check over all of the colors and make one discussion post for all the shade variants you'd want to change with a before->after comparison. — xaosflux  Talk 22:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * . There was a disscussion already about hte colors in general (See Special:Diff/754712927 for more details). Is it enough or do you think more disucssion is needed in this case? Ladsgroupoverleg 22:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * no, as the RfC is 2 years more recent then that request. However, it is good background and I'd include it in a a discussion at WP:VPR or another widely attended venue. —  xaosflux  Talk 22:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

User:Xaosflux, Hey given the consensus, Can you fix this and the other three? Thanks! Ladsgroupoverleg 19:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * reviewing the technical parts. — xaosflux  Talk 00:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * the current images are marked as public-domain, the version you uploaded you licensed as (CC BY-SA 4.0). It is also claimed that the current are not eligible for copyright due to their composition.  Do you agree to re-release these 4 uploads as public domain? (1, 2, 3, 4).  Thank you, —  xaosflux  Talk 00:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This is mostly so that we can target clicks on the images to go to the wikipedia pages, not to the image descriptions for attribution. — xaosflux  Talk 00:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I hereby write that 1, 2, 3, 4 are released under public domain Ladsgroupoverleg 09:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I updated the license to PD-self on commons: — xaosflux  Talk 13:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * — xaosflux  Talk 13:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've executed this by creating a new version of the files, this may take some time to update in page and thumnail caches.  Please review and let me know if you see any issues. —  xaosflux  Talk 13:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Snamaza 91.251.4.61 (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Typo/default description
In the description section “ Full protection lock with grey shackle” -> “ Extended Confirmed protection lock with grey shackle” (This specific edit is CC0 no attribution required)Geardona (talk to me?) 11:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 15:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)