File talk:Harisu DoDo commercial.jpg

This image is a image illustrating a living person. Such images are not accepted under the fair use criteria if there is not a really good reason why a freely licensed image can be created. Rettetast 19:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Plenty of acceptable fair use images illustrate living persons, screenshots of films and TV shows for example. This particular image is a screenshot from a TV advertisment, and is being used to illustrate discussion of the advertisment in the specified article. A freely licensed image that would serve the same purpose could not be created, unless such an image was provided by the copyright holder. Since the use of this image clearly goes beyond mere identification of the person in question, I believe its use satisfies the terms of the license. PC78 20:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with this. The image is not being used to identify the subject, but used in context of discussion of the ad itself, although it would be nice to know if the Adam's apple had been removed/altered during the SRS or something (i.e., why did they have to add it back digitally?).  howcheng  {chat} 20:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It says in the article. She never had a noticable Adam's apple. PC78 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)