File talk:Income-curve-$10k.png

This file has been corrected, and cleaned as asked for in Image_talk:Income-curve-%2410k.jpg I could not upload a PNG to a JPG file, so a new version could not be created on the same page.... Admins Please correct the licensing  Cyberoid    X   03:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I was confused about the licensing, THIS image has been created by me, and it is a modification of the file mentioned above, which was under GFDL. I hope i can release a derivative of a GFDL under FAL.

This image is a good image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.91.92.98 (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Misleading
As a histogram the last two bars really should be 5x wider and 5x shorter than what they are atm. 118.90.35.169 (talk) 03:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The sum of the household-population percentages adds not to 100% but 97.13%, for which the discrepancy of 2.87% should be accounted. Perhaps a category of above 200K incomes (at 2.87%) is necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tperla (talk • contribs) 06:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Citation Needed
Where is this from? 158.121.225.45 (talk) 20:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)