File talk:Infantvictim.jpg

Description
The description is misleading. Flickr is not a source one can trust and there are no other sources to show that the baby was killed because of an explosion and run over by an Israeli tank, thus making it pure propoganda. I'm sure there are photos of dead infants that can hold better under scrutiny and with better sources. Why use this one?--62.0.156.213 (talk) 06:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I tend to agree with you here. I have changed it to a more neutral version. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 22:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Me too. Furthermore, there is no mention of who holds the copyright for the image in question. I believe it should be deleted permanently, since we do not have permission from teh copyright holder of the image.
 * Flickr indeed is not a source one can trust.It is pure propoganda. Wikipedia is not a place for thses kind of games. --Kaaveh (talk) 00:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This baby was not run over by tank. It's pretty obvious. I deeply regret what did happen to it. My condolences to the deceased ones' families. 83.130.8.114 (talk) 21:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)