File talk:Information.svg

Missing highlight
I'm noticing some odd behavior with this svg image. The full preview on the Image page shows the highlight in the svg. Any size smaller than 205 pixels and it doesn't display the highlight.Bobarino 06:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)



It's now fixed in the commons. You can check the discussion page there to find out who fixed it.Bobarino 07:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Heh, to lighten your work I can say that it is me. — Kalan 10:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply to the ciritcism of my citicism
Hi, I appologise if this is not the place to respond to the criticism posted to my talk page, but I am not sure exactly where else to respond.

1) Please understand that I didn't call the instant user a troll.

2)I asked that the behaviour which I have for the past 9-10 years understood to be called "trolling" be performed somewhere else.

Often, I try to ask that something that appears not to be justified be fixed (returned to the way it was before) and then provide a reason. However, the Salem Witch Craft Trials series of articles which is Unusually Prone to Vandalism recently had a major spike in Vandalism on an administrative level. When I attempted to make my objections in the manner which I was directed to do I was stonewalled.

Please in the Future find it within yourself to act towards us in a friendly manner. John5Russell3Finley (talk) 23:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism needs fixing
Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1012

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/28/Information.svg

Andy Dingley (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

threshold of originality
Is this image above the threshold of originality? 95.49.158.57 (talk) 12:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

"Template:Da-delete1" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Da-delete1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 12 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 17:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion - HANG ON
Copied from User talk:LaundryPizza03:
 * Hello User:LaundryPizza03, regarding the notice you left me in Special:Diff/1104098150, I certainly contest this nomination. The history of that file description does not show that you actually tagged the page, and I don't see a good reason why that that page should be deleted under CSDF2. There is a current file attached, and this is a highly used image with over 8 million file links reported, which is why it is kept local. What is going on here? —  xaosflux  Talk 17:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

— xaosflux  Talk 17:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)