File talk:Jeremiah Wright and Bill Clinton at 1998 White House Prayer Breakfast.jpg

Untitled
what relevance does this picture have on this page? The content in it isn't even discussed in the article. Bill did not have him as a pastor and moral compass for 20 years. Why is this photo still here? it looks like another anti-Clinton hit job by Obamabots. The Wright picture was far more deserving of a place here, as it meant something, as the symbol of their relationship and controversy, something this useless photo doesn't convey.Tallicfan20 (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems one of only three free licensed images of Wright yet identified by Wikimedia, and is by far the most recent as the other two are from the early 1960s. Why on earth do you think it is some sort of "hit job" somehow "anti" someone? As far as I can tell, it is an actual photographic record of a White House meeting. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Because the meeting didn't actually MATTER. It made no headlines, and was the subject of no real controversy. he just went to the white house amongst other preachers. Not to mention, there is no actual reference or relevance to the article by having this picture up. its only up so Republicans and Obama supporters can say "Clinton met him too" even tho he didn't call him a moral compass or spirtual advisor or have his kids baptized by him or get married by him. The picture doesn't even have a refernce in the article, being that it doesn't even deserve one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallicfan20 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Talk:Jeremiah Wright is the appropriate place to discuss the inclusion of images in that article, not here. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)