File talk:Jozsef & Maria Barsi.png

Notability rationale
The picture does not just illustrate the subject's parents. It illustrates the appearance of the subject's lifelong abuser and later murderer (Jozsef Barsi, left). I don't see how that can't be significant. I can think of several articles where the subject's significant parent figures/allies/enemies etc. are present, and without dispute: See Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (abusive father present), Michael Jackson (wife present).Mariomassone (talk) 11:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You've missed the point here. Those images are free, so of course they can be used. This image is non-free, and so can only be used if it meets the deliberately strict non-free content criteria. The non-free content criteria do not simply allow images of "notable" or "significant" people in the lives of the subjects of articles; instead, it says that "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." This image does not do that- reader understanding is not diminished in any great way if they don't see a picture of these people. J Milburn (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)