File talk:KennedyLIFE.jpg

It's meant to be on the Reaction to the assassination of John F. Kennedy articled, not the John F. Kennedy article. This shoews the American people's reaction to the assassination and how much the murder affected them. - Dpm12
 * Still, we have free images of him, we can't use non-free per our policy because of that. — raeky  t  22:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It's just a magazine cover, though. How is that not fair-use? - Dpm12
 * Because it clearly fails criteria #1 on WP:NFC, we have ass-tons of free pictures of him. — raeky  t  03:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It's an image I took myself. You're right, there are plenty of images, why not just delete aall those images? Ther'es plenty of 'em. No offense, I'm a nice person, but this is bullshit. This is a cover of a LIFE MAGAZINE that is not menat to be a picture of HIM, but a magazine cover for the Reaction to the assassination of John F. Kennedy artcile. This image works because it shows how America felt because of the assassination. I noticed you uploaded a picture of Hillary Clinton. "We have ass-tons of free pictures" of her. I've been on Wikipedia since 2006, I know what is needed and not needed in articles when it comes to pictures. This is bullshit, and I'm pissed. Again, no offense. Just mad. Does this look familiar: File:Sen. Hillary Clinton 2007 denoise.jpg  Plus, I scanned the magazine image myself - Dpm12
 * The picture of Hillary is a free image, we can have as many of those as we want, without limit. Copyrighted images we CAN'T use, and ONLY under the STRICT exceptions on WP:NFC. Since we have FREE options for JFK, we CAN'T use a non-free one. If this Life cover image was of SIGNIFICANT importance to the article, as in the article had a fairly in-depth discussion about this SPECIFIC cover, then there could be a non-free claim to use it, since there isn't such a discussion about this SPECIFIC Life cover, then it can't be used. You being pissed or not has nothing to do with it. You being a member since the beginning of time or whatever, again has nothing to do with it. You can be a member for any length of period of time it doesn't excuse you from following policies and rules. If you want to challenge my assessment of it, feel free to take this too WP:NFCR. — raeky  t  23:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I wasn't saying because I am a member I can't follow rules. I never said that. What I said is I am not stupid, and that I KNOW WHAT the rules are. Again, I am not mean and don't want you to think that - Dpm12.