File talk:MAMS 1280x800.jpg

Widescreen

 * The tag's qualifications are: "It has also been noted that this picture is fairly large and has an aspect ratio of 4:3 or 5:4, making it suitable as a desktop background (wallpaper) for most computers. See the gallery of all such images." This image meets those qualifications and thus I rolled back the image to place the tag on again. VigilancePrime (talk) 19:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Should we put every image that fits that guideline on the backgrounds page? Not all of them make good wallpaper. I created the category basically to have a place for great images that aren't at featured status. I hope you don't mind if I roll back your rolling back of my edits. - Diceman (talk) 18:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, yes we should! (j/k) I think it's a great idea to have the category and, quite simply, if you created the category I totally defer to your decision on inclusion (or otherwise)! Feel free to roll it back on this or other ones. VigilancePrime (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your good-naturedness. - Diceman (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)