File talk:Montgomery b.png

Sorry, the map has got it's sources. Line of the front is well documented, and the division between Croats and Bosniaks is discussed in the article which is documented as the source of the map... --Čeha (razgovor) 08:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No, the map doesn't have any sources. The souzrce merely mentiones third entity, but source tells nothing about specific borders of third entity. Front line is not a problem, but the rest of the map is. --Ante Perkovic (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * How do you mean it? The guy speaks of 3 southern cantons minus few Bosniak municipalities + Posavina Canton + Croatian municipalities from Central Bosnia. Do you nead a quote ? --Čeha (razgovor) 11:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ...tri jugozapadna kantona, umanjena za nekoliko bošnjačkih općina te nekoliko općina Srednje Bosne i Posavski kanton trebaju tvoriti većinski hrvatski entitet.
 * ...three southwest cantons, minus a few bosniaks municipalities, plus a few croatian municipalities in central Bosnia and Posavina Canton should constitute croatian entity.


 * I still don't see exact list of municipalities. As I see it, they are selected according to this map: File:DemoBIH2006aa.PNG, which is also without a source. --Ante Perkovic (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * As for Herzegovina-Neretva county it is obvious which municipalities Montgomery had in mind (only two with Bosniak majority). Same principal goes for Central Bosnia (Central Bosnia county and Zenica Doboj county). Included in Croatian entity are those which have Croatian majority (which are also the ones in which HVO controled most of the city center at the time and after the Dayton agreement)... --Čeha (razgovor) 10:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)