File talk:Quill-Nuvola.svg

Hello, re the Omkar Goswami article, it points to something unusual -- the subject of the article has made out a reputation that deliberately obscures facts. Eg see

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/specials/leadership2005/omkar_goswani.shtml

http://people.forbes.com/profile/omkar-goswami/27166

But he did NOT have a Wikipedia profile because normally he would NOT be notable! Do you see what I mean? So the Wikipedia article by mentioning the real facts is contributing the truth about the person in comparison to the exaggerations he has placed elsewhere.