File talk:SeEuropeBury1903 c910.jpg

Hmmm
Outdated, factually pretty inaccurate map. Hungary certainly wasn't a kingdom in 910, while Croatia is shown as Byzantine territory for some reason despite being completely cut off from the main part. Apparently the author never knew what tributary state, vassal, suzerainty or province really meant. Or the difference between the two usages of the term Dalmatia (yes there were more than one); the author assumed that "Dalmatia" meant the whole state (which was used by the pope and other sources to denote Croatia), rather than the thema of dalmatia, which comprised the latin-populated cities of the Adriatic coast (Zara, Spalato etc.) and the islands - as proved millions of times, which were formally loyal to the Byzantine emperor. The tiny sklavinije's are rendered autonomous, a thing not very likely for a balanced claim.

But, the map IS from 1903 and I'm aware that views change periodically with new discoveries and so on, but these things are to be pointed out for reference. Er-vet-en  ( say ) 14:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)