File talk:Sea shell (Trinidad & Tobago 2009).jpg

Regarding File history 13:56, 9 June 2013 upload
I appreciate that the artificially colored version was replaced, but am curious as to why Centpacrr chose to remove a highlight and altered the shading/shadow where the main body of the shell transitions to the point?

It makes his edit summary seem a bit disingenuous. "'Returning image to the ORIGINAL request, employing the original image's ORIGINAL background color, texture, shadowing, and size, and with only what the OP requested to be removed being removed.' —User:Centpacrr's edit summary, 13:56, 9 June 2013" Also, IMHO, it seems a little teensy bit 'washed out'. Carried over from the original, not due to anything Centpacrr did. I prefer User:Nagualdesign's 21:06, 8 June 2013 version. Well, technically, I'd likely prefer something in between. But of the two the 21:06, 8 June 2013 shows detail better in my opinion. --Kevjonesin (talk) 16:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)