File talk:Siberian Tiger by Malene Th.jpg

photoshopping/editing
while no doubt a fantastic image, this appears to have been edited to show an artificially shallow depth of field (note the blurriness of the full-size image around the fur, and where the front portion of the log meets the tiger's right arm; should this be noted anywhere, as it's not an "original" image, in terms of being straight out of the camera with only color/brightness/contrast adjustments? it's obviously not a huge concern in the smaller versions, but it's a bit misleading, particularly when viewed at full size. why not just use the original's full depth of field?  i don't think the image would be any less striking, or star-worthy.  67.98.119.5 (talk) 18:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)