File talk:Ubuntu.png

Why has this been marked for deletion? Is Ubuntu not free software? All the images in this picture are from free software.

Thanks

Editors that have nothing better to do than mark images for deletion need their acconts marked for deletion. Low res images do not violate copyrights, and, unlike OS X and Windows (those pages have many screen shots) Ubuntu is open source and under GNU General Public License, thus even a high res image does not violate any copyrights. Stop marking album art, book covers, and screen shots for deletion, and start reverting vandalism and proof reading stuff.

R Landgren (talk) 12:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Size
Should I make my picture a bit smaller? Astroview120mm (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Logos
How on earth are Firefox and Ubuntu "non-free"?! Never before have I ever seen somebody edit out the logo for an article that is about the product that uses that logo. You people seriously need to loosen up. I'm going through all of the other popular Linux distributions and none of their images are edited like this one has been. Even Mac OS X and Windows have all of their logos and program icons intact. Somebody needs to explain this, because this seriously makes no sense. Either that or you guys are just ignorant Linux followers who are freaks about everything being "non-free".Kiwisoup (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * While I wouldn't have worded it in this attitude, I have to agree with Kiwisoup's statements as it is exactly what I felt when I saw the edits done here. I could live with the replacement of the Firefox logo with the unbranded "blue orb" icon but removing the top-left Ubuntu logo from a screenshot simply demonstrating a default Ubuntu desktop is really going a little too far, free or not. eXonyte (talk) 05:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)