Financial Intelligence Unit

A financial intelligence unit (FIU) is a national body or government agency which collect information on suspicious or unusual financial activity from the financial industry and other entities or professions required to report suspicious transactions, suspected of being money laundering or terrorism financing.

Overview
FIUs are normally not law enforcement agencies, but their mission is to process and analyze the information received. If sufficient evidence of unlawful activity is found, the matter is passed to the police or public prosecutors. They complement the apparatus of administrative anti-money laundering supervision, which ensures that obliged entities transmit relevant information to the FIU.

The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units is the global coordination venue for FIUs.

Examples
National FIUs include:


 * Argentina – Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera
 * Aruba - Financial Intelligence Unit-Aruba (FIU-Aruba) (https://www.fiu-aruba.com)
 * Australia – Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC)
 * Austria – Geldwäschemeldestelle im Bundeskriminalamt (A-FIU)
 * Brazil – COAF Conselho de Controle de Atividade Financeira
 * Canada – Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
 * Cyprus - Unit for Combating Money Laundering (MOKAS)
 * France – Tracfin
 * Germany – Zentralstelle für Finanztransaktionsuntersuchungen
 * India – Financial Intelligence Unit (India) (FIU-IND)
 * Indonesia - Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK)
 * Ireland – Garda Financial Intelligence Unit (GNECB FIU)
 * Italy – Unità di Informazione Finanziaria per l'Italia (UIF)
 * Malta – Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
 * Mexico – Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera (UIF)
 * Netherlands – Netherlands Financial Intelligence Unit
 * Russia – Federal Financial Monitoring Service of the Russian Federation (Rosfinmonitoring)
 * Saudi Arabia – General Directorate of Financial Intelligence (GDOFI)
 * Spain – SEPBLAC
 * Turkey – Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK)
 * Ukraine – Financial Intelligence Unit
 * United Kingdom – National Crime Agency
 * United States – Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

European Financial Intelligence Unit Network
The Financial Intelligence Unit Network (FIU.NET) is a decentralized computer network that provides an information exchange between the financial intelligence units of the European Union. FIU.NET is a decentralized system with no central database where the information is collected. All the connected FIUs have their FIU.NET equipment within their own premises and manage their own information. Through FIU.NET the connected FIUs create bilateral or multilateral cases. Ma3tch (autonomous, anonymous, analysis) is a matching tool within FIU.NET. Ma3tch makes it possible for FIUs to match names in order to find relevant data that is possessed by other connected FIUs. As the data is anonymized, there is no breaching of privacy and data protection rules.

Connected FIUs
FIU.NET is funded by the European Commission and participating FIUs. Currently, the connected EU Member State FIUs are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Governing body
FIU.NET is governed by a Board of Partners (BoP) formed by connected FIUs that have volunteered for a seat. The Board of Partners is chaired by an independent Director.

Project management
Daily operation of the system is managed by the FIU.NET Bureau, a project bureau of the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security, which is housed in the Europol International headquarters in The Hague.

FIU reporting in the United States
The United States has several laws requiring the reporting to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). These include the Right to Financial Privacy Act (RFPA) of 1978, the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (and other names of revisions), and the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA). Some reports also need to go to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Actions that can trigger an SAR being filed include:
 * Any kind of insider abuse of a financial institution, involving any amount;
 * Federal crimes against, or involving transactions conducted through, a financial institution that the financial institution detects and that involve at least $5,000 if a suspect can be identified, or at least $25,000 regardless of whether a suspect can be identified;
 * Transactions of at least $5,000 that the institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect involve funds from illegal activities or are structured to attempt to hide those funds;
 * Transactions of at least $5,000 that the institution knows, suspects or has reason to suspect are designed to evade any regulations promulgated under the Bankruptcy Secrecy Act; or
 * Transactions of at least $5,000 that the institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect have no business or apparent lawful purpose or are not the sort in which the particular customer would normally be expected to engage and for which the institution knows of no reasonable explanation after due investigation. The language of the RFPA indicates that a SAR filed under this rule comes from an individual transaction, not a profile of activities that make the transaction stand out.