List of linguistic example sentences

The following is a partial list of linguistic example sentences illustrating various linguistic phenomena.

Ambiguity
Different types of ambiguity which are possible in language.

Lexical ambiguity
Demonstrations of words which have multiple meanings dependent on context.
 * Will, will Will will Will Will's will? – Will (a person), will (future tense auxiliary verb) Will (a second person) will (bequeath) [to] Will (a third person) Will's (the second person) will (a document)? (Someone asked Will 1 directly if Will 2 plans to bequeath his own will, the document, to Will 3.)
 * Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. – Bison (the plural of "buffalos" or "buffalo" is also accepted) from Buffalo, New York, whom bison from Buffalo bully, bully bison from Buffalo.
 * Police police Police police police police Police police. – Police officers from Police, Poland, whom police officers from Police patrol, patrol police officers from Police.
 * Rose rose to put rose roes on her rows of roses. (Robert J. Baran) – Rose [a person] rose [stood] to put rose [pink-colored] roes [fish eggs as fertilizer] on her rows of roses [flower].
 * James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher – With punctuation: "James, while John had had 'had', had had 'had had'. 'Had had' had had a better effect on the teacher", or "James, while John had had 'had had', had had 'had'. 'Had had' had had a better effect on the teacher"
 * That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is. – Grammatically corrected as: "That that is, is. That that is not, is not. Is that it? It is".
 * Can can can can can can can can can can. – "Examples of the can-can dance that other examples of the same dance are able to outshine, or figuratively to put into the trashcan, are themselves able to outshine examples of the same dance". It could alternatively be interpreted as a question, "Is it possible for examples of the dance that have been outshone to outshine others?" or several other ways.
 * Martin Gardner offered the example: "Wouldn't the sentence 'I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-And-Chips sign' have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?"
 * The bears bear hard hard yarn yarns. (Lemony Snicket) – The bears endure tiring and unpleasant long stories about hard yarn.

Syntactic ambiguity
Demonstrations of ambiguity between alternative syntactic structures underlying a sentence.
 * I made her duck.
 * One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I don't know.
 * Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
 * Eats shoots and leaves

Syntactic ambiguity, incrementality, and local coherence
Demonstrations of how incremental and (at least partially) local syntactic parsing leads to infelicitous constructions and interpretations.
 * Reduced relative clauses
 * The horse raced past the barn fell.
 * The coach smiled at the player tossed the frisbee (by the opposing team).
 * While the man was hunting the deer ran through the forest.
 * The weasel that a boy that startles the cat thinks loves smiles eats.

Scope ambiguity and anaphora resolution

 * Every farmer who owns a donkey beats it.

Embedding

 * The rat the cat the dog bit chased escaped.
 * The editor authors the newspaper hired liked laughed.
 * The man who the boy who the students recognized pointed out is a friend of mine.

Punctuation
Punctuation can be used to introduce ambiguity or misunderstandings where none needed to exist. One well known example, for comedic effect, is from A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare (ignoring the punctuation provides the alternate reading).


 * Enter QUINCE for the Prologue
 * Prologue
 * If we offend, it is with our good will.
 * That you should think, we come not to offend,
 * But with good will. To show our simple skill,
 * That is the true beginning of our end.
 * Consider then we come but in despite.
 * We do not come as minding to content you,
 * Our true intent is. All for your delight
 * We are not here. That you should here repent you,
 * The actors are at hand and by their show
 * You shall know all that you are like to know.
 * —ACT V, Scene i

Ending sentence with preposition
Some prescriptive grammar prohibits "preposition stranding": ending sentences with prepositions.

Avoidance

 * This is the sort of English up with which I will not put. (Attributed by Gowers to Winston Churchill. There is no convincing evidence that Churchill said this, and good reason to believe that he did not.) The sentence "does not demonstrate the absurdity of using [prepositional phrase] fronting instead of stranding; it merely illustrates the ungrammaticality resulting from fronting something that is not a constituent".

Compound use

 * "A father of a little boy goes upstairs after supper to read to his son, but he brings the wrong book. The boy says, 'What did you bring that book that I don't want to be read to out of up for?

Neurolinguistics
Sentences with unexpected endings. Comparative illusion:
 * She spread the bread with socks.
 * More people have been to Russia than I have.

Combinatorial complexity
Demonstrations of sentences which are unlikely to have ever been said, although the combinatorial complexity of the linguistic system makes them possible.
 * Colorless green ideas sleep furiously (Noam Chomsky): example that is grammatically correct but based on semantic combinations that are contradictory and therefore would not normally occur.
 * Hold the news reader's nose squarely, waiter, or friendly milk will countermand my trousers.

Semantics and context
Demonstrations of sentences where the semantic interpretation is bound to context or knowledge of the world.
 * The large ball crashed right through the table because it was made of Styrofoam: ambiguous use of a pronoun: The word "it" refers to the table being made of Styrofoam; but "it" would immediately refer to the large ball if we replaced "Styrofoam" with "steel" without any other change in its syntactic parse.
 * The bee landed on the flower because it had nectar: The pronoun "it" refers to the "flower" but changes to the "bee" if we replace "had" with "wanted".
 * We bought the boys apples because they were so hungry: "they" refers to the boys, but if "hungry" is replaced with "cheap", with no grammatical change, it refers to the apples.

Relevance conditionals
Conditionals where the prejacent ("if" clause) is not strictly required for the consequent to be true.
 * There are biscuits on the table if you want some ("biscuit conditional").
 * If I may be honest, you're not looking good.

Ojibwe

 * Gdaa-naanaanaa, Aanaa, naa? meaning "We should fetch Ana, shouldn't we?".

Latin

 * John, Archbishop of Esztergom (Kingdom of Hungary) was pressed to make a statement on the assassination of Gertrude of Merania, and on the first hand the assassination would have been beneficial for the Church but on the other hand taking part in an assassination may have caused him to lose his position and possibly life; so he wrote in 1213: "Reginam occidere nolite timere bonum est si omnes consentiunt ego non contradico". The sentence can be read as "Reginam occidere nolite, timere bonum est, si omnes consentiunt, ego non. Contradico." ("don't kill the Queen, it is good to be afraid, even if all agree I do not. I object."), or the opposite meaning "Reginam occidere nolite timere, bonum est; si omnes consentiunt ego non contradico." ("Do not be afraid to kill the Queen, it is good, if all agree then I do not object.").  It has been quoted by Boncompagno da Signa is his work Rhetorica novissima in 1235 and from there it has been part of the rhetorical education.
 * King Edward II of England was killed, reportedly after Adam of Orleton, one of his gaolers, received a message, probably from Mortimer, reading "Edwardum occidere nolite timere bonum est". This can be read either as "Edwardum occidere nolite; timere bonum est" ("Do not kill Edward; it is good to be afraid [to do so]") or as "Edwardum occidere nolite timere; bonum est" ("Do not be afraid to kill Edward; [to do so] is good"). This ambiguous sentence has been much discussed by various writers, including John Harington.
 * Ibis redibis nunquam per bella peribis.

Mandarin Chinese

 * Various sentences using the syllables, , , , and are often used to illustrate the importance of tones to foreign learners. One example:.
 * Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den: poem of 92 characters, all with the sound shi (in four different tones) when read in Modern Standard Mandarin

Japanese

 * Although at first glance the single character sentence 子子子子子子子子子子子子 does not seem to make sense, when this sentence is read using the right readings of the kanji 子 (in the example it only borrows the pronunciation but not the meaning of the Logograms, like Man'yōgana), it means "the young of cat, kitten, and the young of lion, cub". This would be "猫之子、子猫、獅子之子、子獅子" if it were to be written semantically, with the genitive construction being inferred in the original. It is told in the work Ujishūi Monogatari that the Japanese poet Ono no Takamura used this reading to escape death.

Czech

 * Jedli na hoře bez holí, meaning either "they ate elderberries on a mountain using a stick" or "they ate on a mountain without any sticks" or "they ate elderberry using a stick to eat their sorrow away"; depending on the phrasing or a correct placement or punctuation, at least 7 meanings can be obtained. By replacing "na hoře" by "nahoře", one obtains 5 more meanings. If separating words using spaces is also permitted, the total number of known possible meanings rises to 58.
 * Czech has the syllabic consonants and, which can stand in for vowels. A well-known example of a sentence that does not contain a vowel is Strč prst skrz krk, meaning "stick your finger through the neck."

Korean

 * In Gyeongsang dialect, the repetition of the syllable 가 ("ga") with the right intonation can form meaningful phrases. For example:
 * "가가 가가?" which means "Are they the one we talked about?"
 * "가가 가가가" which means "Since they took it away"
 * "가가 가가가?" which means "Are they the one with the surname Ga?"

German

 * A famous example for lexical ambiguity is the following sentence: "Wenn hinter Fliegen Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen hinterher.", meaning "When flies fly behind flies, then flies fly in pursuit of flies." It takes advantage of some German nouns and corresponding verbs being homonymous. While not noticeable in spoken language, in written language the difference shows: "Fliegen" ("flies"), being a noun, is written with a capital "F", whereas "fliegen" ("to fly"), being a verb, is not. The comma can be left out without changing the meaning. There are several variations of this sentence pattern, although they do not work as smoothly as the original. Dutch language shares this same example, with the noticeable difference of not capitalising the initials of nouns, making it "Als achter vliegen vliegen vliegen, vliegen vliegen vliegen achterna."

Dutch

 * Kees Torn expanded on the example given in the German section ("Als achter vliegen vliegen vliegen, vliegen vliegen vliegen achterna."), from which he created: "Als, in de plaats waar van de makkelijk te zeven zeven zeven zeven zeven zeven zeven, Zeven, zeven zeven zeven zeven zeven, zeven zeven zeven zeven zeven." which uses the fact that zeven has multiple roles: it is a number (seven), a verb (to sieve), a plural noun (sieves) and the name of a German town (Zeven). As such the translation is: "If, in the town where the easy to sieve sieves seven sieves sieve seven sieves, Zeven, seven sieves sieve seven sieves, seven sieves sieve seven sieves".

Persian
A famous example for lexical ambiguity in Persian is the following sentence:

بخشش لازم نیست اعدامش کنید

It can be read either as:

which means "Forgiveness! no need to execute him/her"
 * بخشش! لازم نیست اعدامش کنید

Or as:

which means "Forgiveness not needed! execute her/him"
 * بخشش لازم نیست! اعدامش کنید

Polish

 * Wydrze wydrzę wydrze wydrze wydrze wydrzę which means "The young otter of the otter will steal the young otter from otter"
 * Dział dział dział which means "The artillery department was knitting"
 * Palmy palmy Palmy which means "Let's burn the palm trees in Palma"

Finnish

 * The phrase Kuusi palaa. is frequently used as an example of polysemy in Finnish. It has up to 9 meanings, since each word can be individually interpreted in three ways: kuusi can be "six", "spruce" or "your moon", while palaa can be "returns", "burns" or "pieces".

Indonesian

 * The sentence "kuku-kuku kakiku kok kek kaku, kakak-kakakku?" means "why are my toenails look a bit rigid, my sisters/brothers?". Note that "kek" in Indonesian is an informal form of "seperti" means "look like" or "kind of".
 * The sentence "pukul pemukul pemukul yang memukul pemukul secara pukul-pukulan dan pukul pemukul dengan pemukul pukul dua agar pemukul terpukul karena dipukul dengan pemukul" means "hit the hammer beater that hit the hammer 'riotly' and hit the beater with [a] hammer at 2 o'clock so the beater feel depressed because he was beaten by hammer".