MediaWiki talk:Cite references link many format backlink labels/Archive1

130?
A to dz is 130 cites, is there any chance of someone could raising the limit beyond 130? Maybe add ea to fz? --Dual Freq 19:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good idea. I've added an editprotected tag so that an admin notices this. Tra (Talk) 20:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Gentgeen for adding these. Tra (Talk) 22:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Could we get ia to lz? Thanks. I never expected to use all of the ones we've got, but here I am... I don't need all of these (at least, not yet), but it can't hurt to have a few extra. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 14:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ Done. :) Somehow, I never knew about this page, before -- we learn something every day, eh? – Luna Santin  (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If the same source is being cited 338 times, possibly the &lt;ref> tag isn't the best choice for citing it... --ais523 13:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've found that having a large number of references to a single reference is particularly useful for lists with a reference for each entry, especially if a certain reference supports the inclusion of a large number of list entries. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 19:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I got past 702 on this page... it will probably need a lot more, but there are probably few pages that will also have this high a number, so it would probably be better for me to just simplify it. Someone the Person (talk) 22:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Scratch that -- I'll still need some three-letter backlinks eventually. Someone the Person (talk) 02:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * More than a dozen or so backlinks starts to look ugly and is confusing. Consider the use of cref for a reference used a large number of times. --—— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  14:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)