MediaWiki talk:Gadget-edittop.js

Gadget on templates with documentation
This gadget doesn't work as intended on templates with documentation subpage. Anyway I think it is better to turn off this gadget for templates (by adding wgNamespaceNumber != 10) instead of fixing because actually it is not useful for templates at all. --DixonD (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * How does it not work as intended? It should open the template itself for editing (not the first section of the documentation page).  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 14:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It should but it doesn't. It just copies same links as they are for documentation. Anyway is there any benefit of adding extra edit link for templates if they don't have sections? --DixonD (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm... it does work for me. In fact, the problem you describe has been fixed long ago.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 18:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Easy - href for edit link from documentation looks like, it doesn't have  , so
 * doesn't do his work correctly
 * doesn't do anything all.
 * Actually, I cannot imagine how it could work for you. Maybe is it matter of skin? I use 'vector' one. --DixonD (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I also use vector. I still don't understand the problem though... What do you expect the link to do on a template page?  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 11:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually IMO a link for "editing leading section" is useless on templates at all. But still in case of existence it should provide link for editing template itself but not for editing template documentation. And I explained why it doesn't work. What exact href for the edit link transcluded from documentation you have? --DixonD (talk) 12:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * (←) I get, which is correct; the code is doing its job as intended. Are we talking about the same link? The top link in the green part is not touched by this code.  —  Edokter  ( talk ) — 13:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think it will be easier if you look at the markup that I get, for example, for Template:!: here it is. --DixonD (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Right, that is not correct. In fact, I have no idea how the [purge] link ended up there. Do you have any gadgets enabled?  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 13:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but deactivating them doesn't change anything. In fact, I have no idea how the [purge] link ended up there. Of course, we have it because we are looking for any span with class "plainlinks" and span with links "edit" and "purge" has it as well. Could you also share HTML markup that you get in result so that I could have a look into it? --DixonD (talk) 13:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what I get:
 * It's looking for a .editsection span. If it then finds one that also has class .plainlinks, it will use that one and modifies the link to replace "&section=T" with "&section=0". The [purge] link does not meet the search criterium, so it should never end up there. I really can find no fault in the code, but I'll let someone else look into it.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 15:39, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you also share markup for span with links transcluded from documentation? It seems that you have something quite different in html than me. --DixonD (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * (←) This is the HTML for the top [edit] and [purge] links:
 * This is the second [edit] link (plus header) in the documentation:
 * Both are transcluded versions on the template's page.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 17:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So you have  with [edit] and [purge] links. As it has both classes "editsection" and "plainlinks", it copies to the "lead section" in this script. I cannot understand why you get other result. --DixonD (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No; The [purge] link does not have the .editsection class, so it is ignored by the script. Why it ends up at the top in your case remains a mistery.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 12:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The [purge] span is inside &lt;span class=editsection /&gt; and since the script copies the whole span.editsection of course the result is [edit][purge] above H1. — AlexSm 18:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * So you have  with [edit] and [purge] links. As it has both classes "editsection" and "plainlinks", it copies to the "lead section" in this script. I cannot understand why you get other result. --DixonD (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No; The [purge] link does not have the .editsection class, so it is ignored by the script. Why it ends up at the top in your case remains a mistery.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 12:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The [purge] span is inside &lt;span class=editsection /&gt; and since the script copies the whole span.editsection of course the result is [edit][purge] above H1. — AlexSm 18:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

(←) There are two issues here. First, Template:Documentation creates the construction &lt;span class=editsection...>[edit] [purge]&lt;span&gt; which imho is not very nice but whatever. The other isssue is the logic error in the script introduced with this big edit in April 2009 (by the way, who needs top [edit] on the page with no &lt;H2&gt;s? I don't know). Anyway, the code stops it finds the first span that's not span.plainlinks OR when there are no more spans left. When there are no good spans (like in Template:!) the code ends up with span.plainlinks which was not the intended behavior. The correct loop would be If you replace that code this issue should be fixed. — AlexSm 18:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I still don't understand why Dixon sees the problem while I don't on ! in both IE8 en Chrome9 on XP. I'll change the code (which is basically a line-swap).  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 23:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This basically line-swap changes the logic completely Face-smile.svg --DixonD (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I know. Still doesn't explain why I didn't see the problem. Is it fixed now?  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 11:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, at least for me. --DixonD (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Portuguese translation
Please add 'pt' and 'pt-br' translation of "Edit lead section": pt: 'Editar a seção superior', pt-br: 'Editar a seção superior', Helder 00:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * What is the second line (pr-br) needed for?  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 00:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The script doesn't knows that if a user has selected 'pt-br' (Brazilian Portuguese) and there is no 'pt-br' translation it should use 'pt' (as a fallback language), so it seems to be needed to add both. Helder 01:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅.  — Edokter  ( talk ) — 01:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

MW 1.17 updates and JSHint fixes
Could someone implement this changes? Helder 19:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I spotted one error in
 * "?action=" should be "&action=" as  is already the first url parameter. Also, single statements do not need wrapping in {}.  —  Edokter  ( talk ) — 20:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The code  returns
 * "https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-edittop.js"
 * on the current page, without "?title=", since it uses the value of  (which is equals to "/wikipedia/en/wiki/$1"). I've included the {} because I've validated the code using JSHint, as suggested on mw:Manual:Coding_conventions:
 * * Validate with JSHint as much as possible. Recommended JSHint settings:
 * [x] Require curly braces around all blocks;
 * [x] Don't check line breaks;
 * [x] Browser
 * Helder 20:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Obviously, you use the secure server... on my end,  returns  . Still, the top edit link now points to the wiki URL instead of the full URL the other point to, so not very consistent. The script needs an overhaul anyway; I bet jQuery can slash 75% of the code.  —  Edokter  ( talk ) — 23:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Obviously, you use the secure server... on my end,  returns  . Still, the top edit link now points to the wiki URL instead of the full URL the other point to, so not very consistent. The script needs an overhaul anyway; I bet jQuery can slash 75% of the code.  —  Edokter  ( talk ) — 23:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

edittop and lefteditlinks?
Aloha!

Is there any chance to combine the two respectively the effect of them? Meaning the edit link of the top section appearing next to the page title? No idea how that could be done best, maybe by branching off a "leftedittop.js".

-- Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.179.156.169 (talk) 15:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Documentation for gadget authors
I saw you had done some work on heavily-used gadgets. We're trying to start a library for gadget authors to use. Please check it out and post any questions or comments there. -- ☠ MarkAHershberger ☢ (talk) ☣ 02:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Persian translation
Please add: fa: 'ویرایش بخش آغازین', Thanks, Z 19:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Anomie⚔ 04:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

rtl wikis
is it possible to set float for rtl wikis. in these wikis [edit] comes before page titleReza1615 (talk) 11:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. This should now be working. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Punjabi wiki don't have it
Hello, author/admin. Thanks for such nice tool. I'm using it on English wikipedia but I've not found a preference to use it on Punjabi wiki (pa.wiki). Actually there is no Gadgets setting in the preferences on Punjabi wiki. Please help me how can I make it available there. I strictly need and really miss it there. Please help. Thank you. Tari Buttar (talk) 07:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * An administrator there, will need to create a MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition, and define a list of gadgets to be published in the preferences. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the quicker reply . I'm an admin there, you can explain to me what to do exactly? Tari Buttar (talk) 13:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * In that case I advise you read: mw:Extension:Gadgets. In order to load this gadget, you can create a local gadget on pa.wiki pa:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js which contains


 * You than add the definition :

appearance

 * edittop|edittop.js
 * to the page pa:MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition. Lastly, navigate to pa:Special:Gadgets and fill out/create the remaining description texts to be used to present the interface. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 13:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh thanks! I'm gonna try it. You're welcome on my talk page here and stay in touch. 'll be there if any more help needed about that. Please have a look that there are some spaces in the text between is it okay or there should be no space like URLs? And one more thing that is this text is enough, I mean No need to copy the full source of edittop tool?? Tari Buttar (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Village pump Proposals - Wording and Default
Discussion is currently going at WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 92 about this feature.

Also, a subthread suggests changing the wording from [Edit] to [Edit intro].

There are also suggestions to:
 * 1) Add an automatic edit-summary-prefix, like other subheaders will give you, e.g. /* Header name */
 * 2) * Because currently it just give an empty edit-summary, same as full-page edit
 * 3) * [I suggest /* intro */, or something equally minimal, so that it stands out and gets read, both by the newcomers whilst editing, and watchlist patrollers whilst glancing through lists]
 * 4) Fix the display in old skins (TheDJ lists the broken skins (Nostalgia, cologneblue, standard and simple), and gives an explanation)

HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * See ongoing discussion at 156 (with a huge CC list! be warned). –Quiddity (talk) 02:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixes for Change to section edit links
Please copy the fixed version from commons:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js. All of the skin- and directionality-specific fixes will no longer be needed after the new version of section edit links is live. Matma Rex talk 16:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All done. It seems they're early... big ugly edit links everywhere! — Edokter  ( talk ) — 19:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I copied it verbatim with no guarantee as to its effects. Javascript, being one of the C++ family, leaves me hopelessly confused. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I beat you to it, so all you did was actually removed one line. I restored it. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 19:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I hit before  and it showed  that was different, and on saving, I didn't get an edit conflict. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That is weird. I must have saved it right in between those actions. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 20:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Vietnamese translation
Please add the following item to the  variable:

Thanks!

– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅; thanks. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You broke the gadget :( Remove the last trailing comma before . Matma Rex talk 09:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Yay, Javascript. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Indonesian & Minangkabau translations
Please add the translations for Bahasa Indonesia and Baso Minangkabau. Kind regards, <b style="color:#fff;background:#188ee3;"> Ę-oиė </b><b style="color:#fff;background:#000;"> >>> </b> ™ 07:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

topicon code
I've temporarely restored the topicon code. This should be moved to the righteditlinks gadget. Give me a little time. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 19:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * We have a right edit links gadget ? Sigh, why am I even surprised..... —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 19:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Why does this Edit Top script need the ".style.marginRight" lines exactly? I'm using Monobook and it just seems to unnecessarily add extra space to the right of the protected icons and pending changes box. Gary King  ( talk  ·  scripts )  19:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Because some users have the edit links aligned to the right. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 10:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, so can't we only apply the code for those users? I thought I had something broken in one of my scripts when I applied the Edit Top script yesterday, because it looked so out of place. Gary King  ( talk  ·  scripts )  16:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed, it's now only active if people use that gadget. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 08:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * And in doing so broke the gadget so the edit link overlapped the icons. The error was that you used a type eval ('===') to compare a string (returned by .get) to an integer. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 09:22, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh heavens, I see we have a huge amount of 'mixed case' in the settings. That really shouldn't return a string, it's a boolean option. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Reported 38141 —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually 52542. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 11:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Grr, Safari and it's stupid history caching for redirects... —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 12:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor?
Per this discussion, it might be an idea for the code to be updated to link to VisEd as well as the "source" code. If that seems like too much coding work, fine—I don't see a very pressing need for it (though some might). Sorry for the non-specific editprotected, but I don't know what the code would be...  Ignatz mice•talk 14:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Use editprotected only for specific edits please, not feature requests. That said, this gadget needs a rewrite anyway. I always planned to do this from scratch. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 15:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * As a frequent user of the "edit" link in the lead section, it would be good to have this consistent with the rest of the section "edit" links. I'm not yet sold on VisualEditor (I haven't used it yet, actually), but if I do — and for those who do prefer it — it might quickly become annoying not being able to do in the lead what can be done in every other section independently.  —sroc (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The edittop [edit] link is about the only one which still behaves sensibly. It's always there (doesn't disappear or change its position), always looks the same, and always does the same thing. -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

jQuery rewrite
This gadget has been broken for awhile: neither link is corrected to point to the lead section, because (a) the VisualEditor link is first, but the code only modifies the first link inside the brackets; and (b) VisualEditor now uses the parameter  rather than.

Over at vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js, I rewrote the gadget to address these issues and make better use of jQuery's convenience methods. It's a lot shorter and seemingly just as performant. I also removed the  fallback for skins that have neither a   nor a , because those skins have been removed from MediaWiki.

Finally, I added a couple rules to vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css to ensure that the brackets are spaced the same way they are in page content. (The first rule isn't necessary due to a rule that was already added to MediaWiki:Modern.css here.)

Please consider adopting this code, because I'm getting tired of manually correcting the  in my URL bar. Let me know if you see anything else that needs fixing.

– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 08:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Even with Redrose64's edit, the VisualEditor link still points to the wrong section. That's because the code here still operates on only the first link between the brackets, leaving the second link untouched. The code at vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js fixes both links. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 20:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Performed. Nyttend (talk) 22:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it looks like you accidentally removed whitespace but left everything else as is. So unfortunately the bug remains. I recommend copying vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js wholesale.
 * If you have time, please also consider copying the last two rules in vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css into MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css
 * ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * and referencing that stylesheet from MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition.
 * Eh? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js seems to have substantial differences to the current version. Can you confirm it is okay to copy over? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js seems to have substantial differences to the current version. Can you confirm it is okay to copy over? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's OK. I simply rewrote the script to use jQuery idioms instead of raw DOM methods, but the logic is identical except for the bug fix I mentioned above. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 10:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, done. You're going to have to help me with the last part though. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Awesome, the links actually work again! The rest is all just to space out the brackets just like in ordinary headings:
 * The stylesheet isn't complete yet: everything from the first  to the end of vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css should've been copied into MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css. (I added a comment in there to help you out. Sorry for being ambiguous earlier.)
 * Then, in MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition, append  to the line that begins with.
 * Thanks so much! – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Translation of "top" in summary
Hi, is it possible to add translations of that top which is after [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=595448628 this change] showed in edit summaries? Czech editors would like to rather see úvod there (according to this discussion). Thanks in advance. --16:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC), Utar (talk)


 * The Czech wiki should probably just copy the script to their own wiki, then just replace the word "top" with whatever they want, if they're not doing that already. Gary  ( talk  ·  scripts )  16:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep in mind that "top" must be equal to the actual id at the top of the page, otherwise the link in the edit summary does not work. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 17:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The pages served by the Wikipedia have the element <a ></a> in the same place as those served by the English Wikipedia. Since the   is the same, the pre-filled edit summary should be the same. -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * @Edokter: So it asks for renaming one more thing? Or that id in <a ></a> can't be renamed for other reasons? Is this tag a thing also newly added in MediaWiki or is it something older than your change to edittop.js? --20:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC), Utar (talk)
 * The <a ></a> element has been present in Wikipedia pages for several years. It's inserted by the MediaWiki software into every Wikipedia page (including the Special pages), and AFAIK the sole purpose is to provide a fixed anchor point for the top of the page content, before any site notices and the page title, but below the tabs. We recently decided to utilise  in MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js because it was known to be constant and (in English, anyway) meaningful. More at Village pump (technical)/Archive 123. -- Red rose64 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well yes, making localisation for that top anchor in MediaWiki is probably not the easiest thing, though probably also nothing too difficult. But as Mormegil has pointed out on cswiki technical Village Pump: the correct link from summary to article is in fact not needed. If there is "/* abc */" written in summary it is showed as a link to the headline of that article; in case there is no such headline found, using the link will get you to the top of the article ... which will show you the top section.
 * So: Can you add localisation for summary link to top section here? Even if it is not correctly linked to that anchor it would still show the asked text in summaries and show you the top section when clicked. If such change is not possible/appreciated here, we might copy the gadget page to cswiki and change that part ourselves. --15:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC), Utar (talk)
 * You will have to copy the script. It is not a good idea to add changes to our gadgets intended for other Wikipedias. In the future, there will be global gadgets, which allows fo a better mechanism for localization. — Edokter  ( talk ) — 22:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * We should probably disable the top thing for anything but en.wp —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 15:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Place the cursor at the end of the edit summary textbox
Any chance this script could be updated so that the cursor is placed at the end of the textbox? Right now, when editing the lead section, then hitting "Tab" to move to the edit summary textbox, the cursor is at the start of the text. Perhaps make it start at the end instead? This isn't a huge problem, but it'd be nice.

I think something like the following will work (will need to be tweaked a bit; the last line is most important):

var editSummary = $('input[id=wpSummary]'); var currentSummary = editSummary.val; editSummary.focus.val('').val(editSummary);

Gary ( talk  ·  scripts )  19:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 15 July 2014
Since 90569,  is deprecated and should be replaced by. Could you make replace " " by " getUrl " on this script? This will make the warning " Use of "wikiGetlink" is deprecated. Use mw.util.getUrl instead. " to go away from the console.

Helder.wiki 13:27, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Krenair (talk &bull; contribs) 13:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Bug report: duplicate article titles
There's a bug report at VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive 2014 3 that involves this gadget. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I filed this as . The blame is split between VE and the gadget, but it's a lot easier to fix in VE. :) Matma Rex talk 16:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Bug related to VE
This gadget gives an incorrect link for VE: it includes parameters, but it should actually only include. See here for some relevant discussion. From the explanation given there, it sounds like the right fix would be to add a substitution: any instance of  in the link being duplicated should be deleted. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * done —Th e DJ (Not WMF) (talk • contribs) 09:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks; it works perfectly now. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 16 September 2014 (add kazakh translation)
Please add the translations for kazakh.

Arystanbek (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:38, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 9 August 2015
Can you add localtitle: "Редактиране на началото" for "bg" (bgwiki). Thanks.

Termininja 07:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅.  11:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 11 August 2015
bn: 'সূচনা অনুচ্ছেদ সম্পাদনা করুন', Please add the translations for bengali. --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅.  19:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Master version location?
I think this gadget's master version should be located on MediaWiki.org, the same way how UTCLiveClock and a bunch of other gadgets are. Furthermore, I'd like to have my old coding conventions edits restored to the current version — that is, more spacing, single quotes instead of double and indentation via tabs instead of spaces, as per MediaWiki coding conventions on JavaScript. (I could've done those myself, but I wanted to ensure that this is OK instead of having the changes suddenly overwritten one day.) Would you agree with this proposal? --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No objections from me. The only problem I see is getting all other project to use the MediaWiki version.  16:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Bug: The link sometimes is unclickable (with righteditlinks in Vector)
I use Gadget-righteditlinks.css, which is the setting "Move section [edit] links to the right side of the screen" in the gadget preferences (because I prefer the fixed-to-right position of the links and because it gives a hint if I'm logged in or not).

On a small screen and on pages with long titles such as Athletics at the 2014 Commonwealth Games – Women's 800 metres, depending on the font-size setting ("zoom") in the browser, it sometimes happens that there's no room for the edit link on the same line as the page title, and the link then drops down below the horizontal line (the easiest way to reproduce this is to resize the browser window until it happens).

When that happens, the link becomes unresponsive to clicking (or any mouse action).

This happens with Gadget-righteditlinks and the Vector (default) skin in Firefox, Safari, and Chrome, but not with other skins. --Pipetricker (talk) 09:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The reason I bothered to report the above is that if you encounter this, and (as is quite likely) don't change the zoom level or resize the browser window, this will look like a problem specific to the current article, which may lead you on a wild-goose chase to find which template or other page error is causing it. --Pipetricker (talk) 18:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

No padding between brackets and edit links
Hello, on Czech Wikipedia (cswiki) there is no padding between enclosing brackets and edit links inside. I'm not sure why, on enwiki this just works nicely and the gadget on cswiki just calls the code here. Also no other gadget is affecting this. Could someone look into this matter and find the cause? --Dvorapa (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * notably on Special:Gadgets, we are loading both the javascript, and a css: MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css. cswiki is not using a css. —  xaosflux  Talk 20:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, thank you. Is there a way to just import (programmatically) the css from enwiki into cswiki as it is with javascript or do we have to copy/paste the actual code from enwiki? --Dvorapa (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * At cs:MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.css, you should need just one line:  I've not tested it. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it works, just with one exception: When an article does not contain any heading (other than the article title) the gadget does not work at all. Is it an issue or a future? Is there a way to fix this issue? --Dvorapa (talk) 22:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This is normal behaviour where there are no sections. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 14:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you then. --Dvorapa (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Suggestion for better lead editing UI
As noted on WP:VPT, maybe update the displayed text to indicate it's for the lead? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Interface-protected edit request on 3 March 2022
th: 'แก้ไขย่อหน้าแรกสุด', Please add the translations for Thai. Bebiezaza (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 11:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Poor positioning on Vector-2022
The gadget places the [edit] link adjacent to the page-title. On older skins, that was all below the toolbar at the top, which contained the [edit] link for the whole page. On V2022, the page-title is above that toolbar. So the layout now goes:

[Title] [edit section 0] [row of links, including [edit] for whole page] [lead section] [sections, each with [edit] link]

That's confusing because the edit-section-0 link is not near section-0 and instead a link near the title not near the body suggests that it acts on the whole article. I don't know what the best position is. DMacks (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Gadget causes page layout to shift on pages with a long title
This gadget causes page layout to shift on pages whose titles are long enough that the "[ edit | edit source ]" links wrap to another line, but short enough that the title itself fits in one line. The issue affects all skins, but it's most reliable to reproduce on Vector 2022 with limited width enabled. For example the following pages reproduce the problem for me:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services?useskin=vector-2022
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rollback_of_Vector_2022?useskin=vector-2022 (ironic)

Screenshots: loading – fully loaded

Additionally, on Vector 2022 only, this also causes links to sections to be imprecise, as the added line of text causes the whole page to shift under the scroll position. For example:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services?useskin=vector-2022#History
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rollback_of_Vector_2022?useskin=vector-2022#Background

This could be fixed by reserving space for the link somehow in CSS, so that actually adding the link in JS would not cause the page layout to shift. It would significantly increase the complexity of the code though, so I'm not proposing fixes for now, and just documenting the problem. Matma Rex talk 21:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I proposed a workaround for links to sections in Vector 2022, which is the most annoying part of this problem, in T330108. Matma Rex talk 02:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit summary section link to the lead on mobile
I opened an issue on Phabricator (T362467) to ask that the /* top */ section link is added to the edit summaries on mobile. Since this gadget is where I got the idea, I figured I should let anyone who watches this page know. (I opened that issue a while ago. I would have written this earlier but I forgot.) Nickps (talk) 00:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)