MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown/sandbox


 * Common block reasons
 * Vandalism
 * Vandalism-only account
 * Spamming links to external sites
 * Spam / advertising-only account
 * Creating attack pages
 * Creating nonsense pages
 * Abusing multiple accounts
 * Block or ban evasion
 * Personal attacks or harassment
 * Edit warring
 * Disruptive editing
 * Making legal threats
 * Arbitration enforcement
 * Repeatedly and deliberately triggering the Abuse filter
 * Templated reasons
 * {{anonblock}}
 * {{schoolblock}}
 * {{blocked proxy}}
 * {{usernameblock}}
 * {{spamusernameblock}}
 * {{UsernameHardBlocked}}
 * {{checkuserblock}}
 * {{Tor}}
 * {{Vaublock}}

Protected edit request on 6 May 2019
Four issues should be addressed.
 * 1) Two of the templates should not be bulleted because bulleting them causes Multiline table in list lint errors: rangeblock and Tor.
 * 2) Many of the templates should not be bulleted because bullets causes part of the content to display outside the box.
 * 3) The user of this page needs to see the template name together with the template display.
 * 4) One of the templates is listed twice.

I have solved these four issues in User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. Please take the contents of that template as replacement markup for MediaWiki:Ipbreason-dropdown/sandbox. — Anomalocaris (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: Isn't this the same as MediaWiki_talk:Ipbreason-dropdown?  That conversation still holds.  This is a sandbox, so, okay, but the content you've created in your sandbox can't be used on the actual page so it's not helpful here.  That being said, I think we can just blank the sandbox if it's causing linter headaches, since it was part of a redesign from four years ago and wasn't ever challenged or used since. ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 14:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Amorymeltzer: Thank you for your attention to this. I had forgotten about my edit request on 14 February 2018 of another "template". If this design is no longer on the table, I would favor blanking the page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, it's definitely "on the table" since it was what got used in the actual dropdown, but I'll blank it with a note here, especially since subpages aren't enabled here. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 19:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)