MediaWiki talk:Revreview-reject-summary-cur-short

Protected edit request on 26 February 2014
Please replace the contents of the page with the following:

Reverted NaN $1 pending editss to revision $2 by $3

This doesn't change the appearance or functionality of the message, but it allows several more characters to be used in the custom summary.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Reverted $1 pending editNaN ss to revision $2 by $3
 * I concur with this request, but think that:
 * will be even more efficient. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 21:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The PLURAL magic word is evaluated before the character limit hits, so it doesn't really matter. By the way, it looks like you copied and pasted from the other request, so that uses the wrong parameters. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Even shorter since this is "short", although I'm not sure why this would be used as opposed to the other or why there are two diff messages. Are you "sure" that the PLURAL is substituted in?  If not, it is style taking up bytes in the database entry and being counted. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 21:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm sure. Also, please fix your copy-and-paste to avoid confusion between the parameters. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. When requesting a change to a MediaWiki page, it's always a good idea to give a link to a discussion where that change was agreed. I suspect that the discussion concerned is Village pump (technical)/Archive 124; but I don't see a clear agreement there. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. When requesting a change to a MediaWiki page, it's always a good idea to give a link to a discussion where that change was agreed. I suspect that the discussion concerned is Village pump (technical)/Archive 124; but I don't see a clear agreement there. -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)