MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/July 2010

= Proposed Additions =

allrotour.ro
MER-C 02:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

thecrane.tv
MER-C 10:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

durgapurcity.co.in


MER-C 02:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

acu.ac
This may be a bit unorthodox, but this listing is requested to avoid future issues related to WP:OUTING. See this especially. Contact me via e-mail please for more information about this sensitive request.

ScienceApologist (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This is more than a 'bit' unorthodox imo, and I think wider community discussion might be needed before using the spam blacklist for this sort of thing (unless there are precedents I'm unaware of). Any thoughts by anyone else? A le_Jrb talk 15:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Added LinkSummary for easier review of link. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This requires consensus to blacklist outside of the normal process. Suggest discussing at WP:ANI, and resubmit if consensus supports this. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This requires consensus to blacklist outside of the normal process. Suggest discussing at WP:ANI, and resubmit if consensus supports this. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

ben-engineering.com


MER-C 10:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

ziarasafaris.com
Link is only used for advertising the safari-service, does not provide any additional information usefull for the articles where it was inserted. --R.Schuster (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

f2bbs.com


This was requested for blacklisting around a year ago but it was archived without any action or discussion. The link has no use within any of our articles yet multiple SPAs continue to add it to the Fucked Company article. See WikiProject Spam listing as well as the history of Fucked Company going back the past year for relevant information. The Fucked Company history is nothing more than SPAs adding the links and being reverted as vandalism.  Them From  Space  19:06, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

nevaleeds.co.uk and car-leasing-guide.com
Jminthorne (talk) 04:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * There only appears to be one user involved, and they have only received one warning on their talk page. At this stage, additional warnings would be more appropriate; potentially escallating to a user block if they continue beyond a fourth/final warning.  If the spamming still continues beyond that point, then it could be resubmitted at that point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There only appears to be one user involved, and they have only received one warning on their talk page. At this stage, additional warnings would be more appropriate; potentially escallating to a user block if they continue beyond a fourth/final warning.  If the spamming still continues beyond that point, then it could be resubmitted at that point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

financeacar.co.uk


Jminthorne (talk) 04:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * I'm not seeing ongoing abuse of this URL. The remaining two articles containing it are as refs, so it may be useful to bring this up for discussion on the article talk pages or at WP:RSN to see what consensus exists for it's appropriateness. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing ongoing abuse of this URL. The remaining two articles containing it are as refs, so it may be useful to bring this up for discussion on the article talk pages or at WP:RSN to see what consensus exists for it's appropriateness. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Video software spam


Domains related to aimersoft.com:
 * Related domains

Domains related to iskysoft.com:

Previously reported spam:

for some sample spammers... this is more annoying than Internet Brands. MER-C 08:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

instantmedicalcare.com


MER-C 10:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

quickeyespeedreading.com
Repeated spamming on the speed reading article. They spam, people add text or munge things without knowing how to undo, things get annoying, people manually delete spam, more spam appears. Two Many diffs, but there are many many in the history, going back months: The spammers seem to be operating from home or something, since the IPs change a lot:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Destynova (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Destynova (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Destynova (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Destynova (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

airsoftsentry.com

 * link


 * account


 * relatedsites

The site redirect to paintballsentry.com - which is already listed on the local SBL. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No serious spamming issues, methinks. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * per Stifle. A le_Jrb talk 10:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Whoohow .. no .. this is a serious spamming issue.
 * Blatant promotion and other forms of spamming, including blacklist evasion by inserting non-clickable links and by creation of new domains. Is this still going on (I did block the editor in question already, and I did blacklist a number of domains of this spammer)?  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 11:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I made the above report due to spamming, using new domains to get around existing blacklisting, sockpuppetry and block evasion. However, the spamming seems to have stopped again at about the same time this had been reported - so no immediate need for blacklisting at this time. Although, should it resume, this should be re-requested. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Blatant promotion and other forms of spamming, including blacklist evasion by inserting non-clickable links and by creation of new domains. Is this still going on (I did block the editor in question already, and I did blacklist a number of domains of this spammer)?  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 11:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I made the above report due to spamming, using new domains to get around existing blacklisting, sockpuppetry and block evasion. However, the spamming seems to have stopped again at about the same time this had been reported - so no immediate need for blacklisting at this time. Although, should it resume, this should be re-requested. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Blatant promotion and other forms of spamming, including blacklist evasion by inserting non-clickable links and by creation of new domains. Is this still going on (I did block the editor in question already, and I did blacklist a number of domains of this spammer)?  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 11:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I made the above report due to spamming, using new domains to get around existing blacklisting, sockpuppetry and block evasion. However, the spamming seems to have stopped again at about the same time this had been reported - so no immediate need for blacklisting at this time. Although, should it resume, this should be re-requested. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Stewweb.com
Probably an attack site. The consensus at Talk:2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash is that it is not a WP:RS. Can we block this site please. Mjroots (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Obvious antisemitic junk on the site here.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 08:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * COIBot came up empty on this one. If abuse of this URL is still ongoing, can links or references to the user accounts involved be listed?  Is this an issue with a single user adding the link, or is it more widespread? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:00, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * due to lack of evidence to show abuse. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

ahollywoodnews.com


MER-C 07:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Teddy bear spam



 * Spammers

MER-C 08:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

califormula.wordpress.com
An anon IP has been repeatedly trying to add a link to a blog that "reviews" movie trailers, hosted by Wordpress. Xlinkbot removed the first, and despite repeated warnings from various users, the link has been added and dleted 20 times. I believe the spamming will not cease.



Angryapathy (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - appears to be a one-user incident that has not (as yet) resumed following the user being blocked. If it does start again, the URL should be re-submitted. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

planetill.com
As far as "diffs" just look at every edit made by Dr.deisel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.50.21 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 9 July 2010
 * ✅ - self-confessed COI with failure to discuss on talk pages despite being reverted by multiple parties. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

venusianarts.weebly.com



 * Spammers

MER-C 03:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Appears to have been a one-day event and not on-going ... also link now shows "site not published", so may have been taken down or moved. If it resumes, then can be resubmitted. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:39, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Appears to have been a one-day event and not on-going ... also link now shows "site not published", so may have been taken down or moved. If it resumes, then can be resubmitted. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:39, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

airployment.com


MER-C 03:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:24, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

bonethefish.com



 * Per recent discussion and consensus at ANI: see here.  Them From  Space  04:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not seeing consensus on the ANI discussion to blacklist outside of normal process, and appears to have stopped for now. However, with the evidence of off-wiki canvassing, if the advert-linkspam resumes, then the URL should be resubmitted for blacklisting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not seeing consensus on the ANI discussion to blacklist outside of normal process, and appears to have stopped for now. However, with the evidence of off-wiki canvassing, if the advert-linkspam resumes, then the URL should be resubmitted for blacklisting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Pakistani MFA spamming


Long term massive, uncontrollable spamming including WP:REFSPAM. if you really want to know. MER-C 09:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Bestmateuk's spam


Google Ad-laden sites that are copy-and-pastes of the real ones. JaJaWa (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * For reference to help substantiate, what are the real ones? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * http://www.sealife.co.uk/london is one. This is garden variety Adsense spamming. I see that the user responsible




 * wasn't warned (until now). I see no other evidence of spamming, so this is for the time being. MER-C 05:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

AniDb


AniDb.info was already added to the blacklist 2 years ago for actively facilitating the distribution of copyrighted material without the owners permition. However, since then, the website has changed it's domain name to anidb.net. I've recently removed several links from article space. —Farix (t &#124; c) 03:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

pifeedback.com/eve/forums
Not technically "Spam" per say, but a totally unreliable user-content forum used across many articles to provide TV ratings before such ratings are reported in other, reliable sources. A recent discussion at RSN makes it clear this is an unreliable source - see. Hipocrite (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Added LinkSummary for easier review/reference:
 * Although being unreliable is not grounds in itself for blacklisting. The link is currently in use on a few hundred articles; submitting to COIBOT now to search for signs of spamming. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - Unable to find evidence that the URL has been abusively spammed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - Unable to find evidence that the URL has been abusively spammed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

ncpdtoo.info


Spammed by multiple bots tonight, see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and sample diff. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See also . --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

mykasur.tk
Redirects to blacklisted site



Spammed as recently as two days ago. MER-C 09:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Adsense pub-6276505817352257 2

 * Previous incidents
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2010 Archive Jul 1


 * Sites spammed


 * Related domains


 * Spammers

MER-C 09:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

jeopardytrainer.com
Redirects to already blacklisted domain



at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/July 2010.



for original report by WeijiBaikeBianji. MER-C 13:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Also
 * Diffs -
 * Destynova (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

sasgo.info
Used especially badly by now blocked User:Irrypride. Bart133 t c @ 01:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ by . --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This site is now blacklisted globally. MER-C 02:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

sunposesolar.com

 * posted by spammer 60.186.188.189. Joja  lozzo  04:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

freeinternetsales.com

 * being spammed by &mdash; e. ripley\talk 02:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - only able to find evidence of one IP adding the link on one day, not persistent abuse. User can be blocked, and if it resumes under alternate accounts resubmit the URL for blacklisting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

solar-heater-china.com

 * per.
 * other IPs in this block are known spammers. Joja  lozzo  04:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - only able to find evidence of one IP adding the link on one day, not persistent abuse. User can be blocked, and if it resumes under alternate accounts resubmit the URL for blacklisting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

First batch of Internet Brands domains


Yay, I finally made it. MER-C 07:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * . --Dirk Beetstra T  C 09:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

fishoilblog.com
Repeatedly added to multiple articles, by multiple IPs and now most recently by User:NutrisaurusRex. See recent history of Fish oil, Omega-3 fatty acid and Omega Protein.

clearly a commercial product site and meet inclusion guidelines, however it seems to be currently under controll. thanks for the report --Hu12 (talk) 16:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Adsense pub-6870423499136152

 * Previous incidents
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2010 Archive May 1


 * Sites spammed


 * Spammers

MER-C 09:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * --Hu12 (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Voobly.com

 * I thought it previously added, but apparently they are still posting links to it. I just reverted a new account who added the spam in two articles previously hit by spammers for the Voobly site.   A week ago they spammed other articles with the Voobly link as well.  Banning the user account doesn't matter, there always a new one created.  Here is a link to the previous spam reports filed on people.   He also spammed  with the Vooby, AocZone, and gameranger links.  Sometimes the spammers give a link to Voobly as well as one other sites at the same time, they perhaps the same company.  D r e a m Focus  18:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As a current gamer of Star Wars: X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter and Star Wars: X-Wing Alliance, I can tell you that Voobly.com has effectively replaced the Errant Venture as the client of choice for online gaming. The use of Voobly can be attested to by navigating to one of the Battlestats competition pages, for example: http://www.battlestats.com/events/?3681
 * So, although the link may appear to be a spam, it is still a link to a valuable multiplayer resource for older games. I would like to see Voobly.com removed from the blacklist. (MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist - my whitelist request)
 * As an aside: Voobly.com and GameRanger.com are two separate entities to the best of my knowledge, as they have their own, very different online game hosting clients.
 * RS HeavyD (talk) 03:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * So, although the link may appear to be a spam, it is still a link to a valuable multiplayer resource for older games. I would like to see Voobly.com removed from the blacklist. (MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist - my whitelist request)
 * As an aside: Voobly.com and GameRanger.com are two separate entities to the best of my knowledge, as they have their own, very different online game hosting clients.
 * RS HeavyD (talk) 03:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I would also like to see the removal of voobly.com from the blacklist. I was (still am!) a keen AOE II player myself, and when Microsoft shut down MSN zone I in fact setup a website of my own with some friends to develop a client for online play. After several months of getting constantly attacked and put out as spammers by 'rival' websites and other delinquents who just happened to be attracted by these game sites I decided just to close the site down. It is unfortunate that sites like this attract a lot of juvenile delinquents that behave in this way but it is rather harsh to punish or blacklist genuine developers (and their sites) because of the actions of persons unrelated to the site or the developers, and the costs and complexities of trying prevent this action by legal means is prohibitive for most companies never mind for small developers just starting out. I know some of the people at Voobly and these guys are definitely not spammers, it is most likely that they are suffering a similar situation as that which I personally experienced with my own site (which I now redirect to voobly incidentally!). I only discovered voobly was on the blacklist when I tried to update my own personal page to reflect that I am a keen AOE II player and mention that I play at voobly, and it would not accept the link. This is rather sad to see.

Chrissyboi (talk) 02:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Request made at whitelist, closed --Hu12 (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hamptons.com
. Various users and IPs adding to The Hamptons article. I had the article semiprotected for a while, but when it lifted the links started happening again. Syrthiss (talk) 12:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Linked quite widely .. maybe needs some cleanup. I'll have a look at COIBot's report in a bit.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 12:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Quite a few links, however no spamming since report date. marking this as, for now--Hu12 (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

speedwayresearcher.org.uk
MER-C 02:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, please. This site has had a nasty history with spamming going back to 2006.  Them  From  Space  07:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Annoying, but has only really been spammily added by one user, who has been blocked several times for it, and can be again if it resumes. Several other uses appear genuine, so I'm tempted to leave it be... A le_Jrb talk 07:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's been on the Harringay Stadium article for a while now and I think it adds real value. It looks to me like it's someone's personal passion. If they've added it too widely, I imagine that their motivation stems from misguided passion and can most likely be reined in with a kind but firm word. I'd regret seeing it removed from the Harringay article. hjuk (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * "Can most likely be reined in with a kind but firm word"... we've tried that. That IP has been blocked four times up to 6 months for spamming and isn't going to stop. MER-C 13:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it added to irrelevant articles? As I said, it adds value to the Harringay Stadium one. If the other articles it's added to benefit from the links, I don't see a problem. Any road up, no big deal for me. I've said my piece. You guys decide. hjuk (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems there is a disturbing history surounding linkage of this site. Since spamming has ceased I'm inclined to mark this as for now. If further evidence is presented, due to the long term nature of the problem, we should add it.--Hu12 (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

musthavetoday.com
Edits to Skype and Skype security from multiple IP addresses. This edit vandalized replaced a relevant reference with a n irrelevant one: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skype_security&diff=prev&oldid=363785442. See other edits of Special:Contributions/109.178.95.157, Special:Contributions/109.178.96.58, Special:Contributions/109.178.112.232. Pnm (talk) 22:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Seems to have stopped for now. report back if spamming resumes. thanks for the report--Hu12 (talk) 15:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

belgovision.com
Numerous reports of malware, malicious content etc. See http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/belgovision.com


 * Also http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/belgovision.com reports Adware, spyware, or viruses (3)✅--Hu12 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

expressor-software.com
MER-C 12:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * . If additions resume, will add--Hu12 (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

vishnupriya.in
MER-C 13:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * . seems to have stoped, further additions warrant adding to SBL--Hu12 (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

flowtechinstruments.com


MER-C 11:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * seems to have stoped, further additions warrant adding to SBL. --Hu12 (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

advocatemizan.com
-- A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * --Hu12 (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

= Proposed Removals =

afroradio.it
Please remove this website www.afroradio.it from blacklist rating.The site is only a web radio amateur, contains only streaming music, many listeners do not understand why www.afroradio.it entered the blacklist! thanks afroradio webmaster —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.107.49 (talk • contribs)


 * First, it is not listed here, but on meta. The reason can be found here, repeated and continued additions to wikis by, mostly, 1 IP.  And since none of the additions were on it:Afro Radio or Afro Radio (the official link of the station would of course be a good link on the page itself, but neither exist, and I wonder if the station is notable enough for having an own page), but all to other pages linked to the genre of the music, they all fail, at least here on the en.wikipedia, our policies and guidelines.   here, and  if you'd like to have it delisted.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 09:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

nisargadatta.co.cc
This is a non-commercial site dedicated to a spiritual master. I was trying to add an external link to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nisargadatta_Maharaj and was told that this domain is blocked. It may have happened because it is not a proper TLD and the root domain might be involved in some spam issues. Kindly remove my site from the blacklist. --Manu.hotmail (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ Personal dedication sites do not meet WP:Reliable sources or WP:EL guidelines. No reason to whitelist. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

myolie-wu.co.cc
This is a fansite of Myolie Wu, it contains the latest Myolie Wu news, functions and photos. So it must be useful to all Myolie Wu fans in the world. The news are from Hong Kong sources and are translated into English, helpful for those who can't read Chinese, to let them up to date with Myolie Wu. I tried to put this website at Myolie Wu External links (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myolie_Wu), but was told: "Either that exact link, or a portion of it (typically the root domain name) is currently blocked." I hope the website can be removed from the blacklist.
 * ❌ per EL and WP:COI. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

carloscevola.com
Please remove this website www.carloscevola.com from blacklist rating. This site contains extensive info about Offshore Jurisdiction.Carlo (the founder) of carloscevola.com actually wrote most of the content on the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offshore_company. The site has no intent to establish hits nor to promote the website or the company.Please remove from Spam listing, blocking this website means missing lots of info about Offshore jurisdiction from Wikipedia.Carlo's book the offshore jurisdiction guide is "Carlo Scevola, Offshore Jurisdictions Guide". I would like to link this book on Wikipedia as it contains lots of informative content regarding Offshore Jurisdiction.

I feel that the website has some good information on the subject. The site has detailed information on company formation in all major offshore company jurisdictions. As such, I think that the website should not be banned from Wikipedia.

--Imdanielmario (talk) 04:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)ImdanielmarioImdanielmario (talk) 04:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)--
 * ❌ Commercial company sites usually aren't good choices for sources. Furthermore, we usually don't remove sites from the blacklist upon the request of someone affiliated with the site, as seems to be the case here. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

AsianMediaWiki.com
Can you remove the blacklist for the above mentioned site? I am trying to edit the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Nam_Gil page citing AsianMediaWiki's Kim Nam-Gil's biography but can't due to this blacklist. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.236.170.103 (talk) 18:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that site doesn't meet our standards for sources (its content is user-contributed) especially in a biography of a living person. MER-C 05:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

pln-autoaprender.webcindario.com
I've read The external links guideline so now i know i've added inappropiate links to attract visitors to this website. I'm sorry about it and, as not all links that i had added were removed, i've just completed the work and removed all my links. You can check it. Now, i would like this website not to be in the blacklist.
 * It's not on our local blacklist, it's on Meta's global blacklist. You can make your request there. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

theloopny.com
Not sure why this site is blacklisted. It's a hyperlocal news blog - not a spamming site like the user who had blacklisted it claims it to be.
 * ❌ It was added MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/August_2009. It's redirecting to a site that was already blacklisted. No valid reason given to remove it. Whitelisting individual links may be appropriate if an established editor makes the request. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Should I put in requests for the other domains it points to, getinloop.com and larchmontloop.com? They're all the same news site. Iloverefridgeration (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * We know they all point to the same site. That's why they're all blacklisted. We've had numerous accounts trying to add them, that's why they're blacklisted. As I said before, a whitelisting to a specific link might be considered if it came from an established editor, but we generally don't remove entries from the blacklist at the request of someone affiliated with the site or a single purpose account. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 21:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

= Troubleshooting and problems =

= Discussion =