Module talk:Infobox multi-lingual name

Sandbox
- This module uses a sandbox module. Christian75 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * the module was related to lua conversion of Infobox Chinese. Since he/she is an admin, the module can increase protection level, and move out from sandbox entirely by the decision of the admin and template editors. Matthew hk (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it's just a mistake. Modules should not use sandboxes, because everybody should be allowed to use the sandboxes - that's the point of having sandboxes. Christian75 (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just an oversight on my part; fixed. I have raised to protection level of this module and ~/data to match.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 10:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Template merger
I'm currently implementing the mergers with Infobox East Asian name and found that alternative names aren't supported for Korean and Japanese. Could this be added? I will take a look at implementing it myself, but if you who already understand this template and have done it already for chinese could do it that would be very appreciated. Thanks! --Trialpears (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ping did not work. What do you mean by alternative names aren't supported for Korean and Japanese?
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 11:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I was reffering to fields such as hangul2 and kana2. --Trialpears (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Tangut
Could someone add support for Tangut characters and transcription, for use in. BabelStone (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * you can use:
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks! BabelStone (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikilink for Wu Chinese romanization
Could any language lover advised me how to replace the plain-text column "Romanization" with  for the language wuu (Wu Chinese)? For example, see the transcription section of the Template:Infobox Chinese on the right. -- love.wh  09:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems some mystery language lover have fixed it, thanks! -- love.wh  02:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Unnecessary font specification
Why is the following line, 919 necessary?  It tags the Zhuang language text in this font. Test the article, Nanning. I see that, Namzningz is written in basic Latin alphabet, therefore, it is very unnecessary, and if it should still be, then a  must be included to allow us to change (nullify) the choice of the font.


 * Example edit:

Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)