Phonotactics

Phonotactics (from Ancient Greek "voice, sound" and  "having to do with arranging") is a branch of phonology that deals with restrictions in a language on the permissible combinations of phonemes. Phonotactics defines permissible syllable structure, consonant clusters and vowel sequences by means of phonotactic constraints.

Phonotactic constraints are highly language-specific. For example, in Japanese, consonant clusters like do not occur. Similarly, the clusters and  are not permitted at the beginning of a word in Modern English but are in German and Dutch (in which the latter appears as ) and were permitted in Old and Middle English. In contrast, in some Slavic languages and  are used alongside vowels as syllable nuclei.

Syllables have the following internal segmental structure:
 * Onset (optional)
 * Rhyme (obligatory, comprises nucleus and coda):
 * Nucleus (obligatory)
 * Coda (optional)

Both onset and coda may be empty, forming a vowel-only syllable, or alternatively, the nucleus can be occupied by a syllabic consonant. Phonotactics is known to affect second language vocabulary acquisition.

English phonotactics
The English syllable (and word) twelfths is divided into the onset, the nucleus  and the coda ; thus, it can be described as CCVCCCC (C = consonant, V = vowel). On this basis it is possible to form rules for which representations of phoneme classes may fill the cluster. For instance, English allows at most three consonants in an onset, but among native words under standard accents (and excluding a few obscure loanwords such as sphragistics), phonemes in a three-consonantal onset are limited to the following scheme:


 * + stop + approximant:
 * stream
 * + +  (not in most accents of American English)
 * stew
 * sputum
 * sprawl
 * splat
 * skew
 * scream
 * sclerosis
 * squirrel
 * scream
 * sclerosis
 * squirrel

This constraint can be observed in the pronunciation of the word blue: originally, the vowel of blue was identical to the vowel of cue, approximately. In most dialects of English, shifted to. Theoretically, this would produce. The cluster, however, infringes the constraint for three-consonantal onsets in English. Therefore, the pronunciation has been reduced to by elision of the  in what is known as yod-dropping.

Not all languages have this constraint; compare Spanish pliegue or French pluie.

Constraints on English phonotactics include:


 * All syllables have a nucleus
 * No geminate consonants
 * No onset
 * No in the syllable coda (except in Hiberno-English)
 * No affricates in complex onsets (except when underlying and  are analysed as  and )
 * No in complex onsets
 * The first consonant in a complex onset must be an obstruent (e.g. stop; combinations such as *ntat or *rkoop, with a sonorant, are not allowed)
 * The second consonant in a complex onset must not be a voiced obstruent (e.g. *zdop does not occur)
 * If the first consonant in a complex onset is not, the second must be a liquid or a glide
 * Every subsequence contained within a sequence of consonants must obey all the relevant phonotactic rules (the substring principle rule)
 * No glides in syllable codas (excluding the s of diphthongs)
 * The second consonant in a complex coda must not be, , , or (compare asthma, typically pronounced  or , but rarely )
 * If the second consonant in a complex coda is voiced, so is the first
 * An obstruent following or  in a coda must be homorganic with the nasal
 * Two obstruents in the same coda must share voicing (compare kids with kits )

Sonority Sequencing Principle
Segments of a syllable are universally distributed following the Sonority Sequencing Principle (SSP), which states that, in any syllable, the nucleus has maximal sonority and that sonority decreases as you move away from the nucleus. Sonority is a measure of the amplitude of a speech sound. The particular ranking of each speech sound by sonority, called the sonority hierarchy, is language-specific, but, in its broad lines, hardly varies from a language to another, which means all languages form their syllables in approximately the same way with regards to sonority.

To illustrate the SSP, the voiceless alveolar fricative is lower on the sonority hierarchy than the alveolar lateral approximant, so the combination  is permitted in onsets and  is permitted in codas, but  is not allowed in onsets and  is not allowed in codas. Hence slips and pulse  are possible English words while *lsips and *pusl are not.

The SSP expresses a very strong cross-linguistic tendency, however, it does not account for the patterns of all complex syllable margins, as there are both initial as well as final clusters violation the SSP, in two ways: the first occurs when two segments in a margin have the same sonority, which is known as a sonority plateau. Such margins are found in a few languages, including English, as in the words sphinx and fact (though note that phsinx and fatc both violate English phonotactics).

The second instance of violation of the SSP is when a peripheral segment of a margin has a higher sonority than a segment closer to the nucleus. These margins are known as reversals and occur in some languages including English (steal, bets  ) or French (dextre  but originally , strict ).