Portal talk:Current events/2013 April 18

Coverage of Bahrain
Since does not want to talk about this and has deleted my attempt to do so on their talk page I will initiate discussion here. Here they let out an astonishing and uncalled for outburst at me: "dude in all fairness to WP:CIVIL - i have to ask are you just flat out "addicted" to maheim - you seem to be trying to do good work most of the time - but vandalism is vandalism and it just wastes all the other editors times)" My offence? This, apparently. The same editor has since removed it again. Why are events in Bahrain being censored by Wikipedia? It violates no policy that I am aware of. 68.231.15.56, however, appears to be dismantling the fourth pillar in their bid to remove mention of Bahrain. --86.40.107.69 (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * laugh - please sockpuppet change your IP a few more times and carry on a discussion on this page it should be very amusing--68.231.15.56 (talk) 14:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Yes I know what it is, but do you? "To deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards and policies." How does this apply here? I am not '"addicted" to maheim' or anything else you've previously claimed. Your attitude and unwillingness to deal with any opposition to what you want is completely unhelpful. --86.40.107.69 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

86.40.111.203 80.116.73.145 86.40.194.82

so you are saying that all these recent puppets are not you? - damn they sure to look similar in every way i can detect--68.231.15.56 (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * "all these recent puppets are not you" - yes actually, that's exactly what I'm saying. Full stop. They're not even all in the same country for goodness sake. Apart from which, could you point how exactly these are puppets, as defined above? Even if these were all the same editor, were all in the same country, they wouldn't necessarily be puppets. Editing in passing like that is not sockpuppetry. This section was not even intended to be about this but you've changed the discussion topic. --86.40.107.69 (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)