Surveillance Camera Code of Practice

The Surveillance Camera Code of Practice is a code of practice devoted to the operation of CCTV systems in the United Kingdom particularly in England and Wales. It was introduced under Section 30 (1) (a) of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. This code of practice was established in response to growing concerns regarding the potential abuse or misuse of surveillance technologies by governmental bodies such as local authorities and police forces, particularly in public spaces.

Overview
The need for such a code arose due to apprehensions surrounding the unchecked expansion of surveillance capabilities by state entities, and the potential implications for civil liberties and privacy rights. In England and Wales, the Home Office took action to address these concerns by introducing the code, which emphasizes the responsible and accountable use of surveillance cameras.

Application
The code applies not only to public bodies but also encourages compliance from private operators of surveillance systems. It sets out clear guidelines for the use, access, retention, and security of data collected through surveillance cameras. Furthermore, it advocates for adherence to operational, technical, and competency standards to ensure the lawful and ethical use of surveillance technologies.

Governance
Under the auspices of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, the position of Surveillance Camera Commissioner was established to oversee the implementation of the code. The commissioner, currently Andrew Rennison, is tasked with promoting compliance, evaluating the effectiveness of the code, and recommending any necessary amendments.

Provisions
The code mandates that surveillance cameras must be employed only for specific and legitimate purposes, and only when there is a pressing need to do so. Additionally, it emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual privacy rights.

Reception
While proponents of the code argue that it represents a significant step towards ensuring the responsible deployment of surveillance technologies, critics, such as the campaign group Big Brother Watch, contend that it does not go far enough in safeguarding individual privacy rights. They argue for broader applicability of the code, stricter enforcement mechanisms, and enhanced accountability for breaches.