Talk:"Slut!"

Alleged single status
Is it really one as per WP: SINGLESCRIT?  ℛonherry  ☘  20:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes. Under "Factors that suggest a song is a single", The song was serviced to radio stations with an official add date and "Factors that don't affect the legitimacy of a single", The song was only released in one territory/to one radio format. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 01:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I examined the article (using Google Translate of course) and it does say that "Slut!" was available on radio So yes, it is a single, just that not a US single. Ippantekina (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep.  ℛonherry  ☘  09:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 December 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Slut! → "Slut!" – The quotation marks are part of the title, and multiple critics have pointed out the quotation marks as a defining feature of this song. Ippantekina (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment If that's the case, then should the song's title be written ""Like this"" (standard formatting quotation marks and quotation marks used in the title) in the article prose instead of "Like this" (standard formatting quotation marks only, currently used in the article prose)? QuietCicada - Talk 02:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * We can do Slut (as in Heroes). Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Support based on above comparison to the article "Heroes" (David Bowie song). -JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom Bluesatellite (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. — VAUGHAN J.  ( TALK ) 05:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom and because quotations marks are actual punctuation marks and not stylization. Stylization would be if it was titled "SluT!" or "5lut!" or something like that. 94.191.152.112 (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)