Talk:"Slut!"/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Will begin soon. Skyshifter  talk  00:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

General comments

 * Image and audio files have valid fair use rationales
 * No copyvio — the link at the top just copies from this article. Other sources are slightly high for citing the song's own lyrics, which is fine.

Infobox and lead

 * Ok

Background

 * Ok

Release

 * I am unsure if the last paragraph should be here. I think it would fit best in "Background". "Release" should only talk about the 1989 (Taylor's Version)-related aspect of the release, IMO.
 * Added to a new section called "Release and commercial performance".


 * I've added a missing exclamation mark.
 * Thanks!

Production and lyrics

 * You joined three references for the "a gentle and tender track" sentence (2nd para), but didn't for the "intense romance" (3rd para) sentence. I think that should be consistent.
 * Done.


 * - you should say that Bailey is the one who compared the lyrics
 * Added more references to show that Bailey is not the only one.

Reception

 * -> Barnes proceeded
 * Tweaked.


 * -> I think this should be just be because it refers to the word, not the title of the song?
 * You're right. Fixed.


 * remove "at"
 * Done.

Other sections

 * "Credits and personnel", "Charts", "Certifications" and "Release history" are fine. I've added a missing exclamation mark for "Certifications".
 * All references are properly formatted. I've noticed you wrote %22Slut!%22 for the title in some chart templates because the URL needs those. I'm not sure what is the best course of action here. I think that formatting those references manually instead of using single chart would be the best solution.

Spot-check
Randomly chose 13, 20, 24, 26, 35, 37,42, 48. All of them check out, except for 20 - it does confirm that the media portrayed Swift as a "serial dater", but it doesn't mention "following a series of publicized romances with other male celebrities".
 * Added sources to the ref #20.

Skyshifter  talk  23:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Should be done now. Thanks for the review :) Ippantekina (talk) 04:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The %22Slut!%22 thing was not done, however I think it's minor. Note that for FA this change will probably be necessary. I am going to ✅ this article now, congratulations! Skyshifter   talk  10:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)