Talk:(532037) 2013 FY27

Lame
Why are people trying to remove mention of and  when all 3 objects were announced only days apart by Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo in March/April 2014. Do these objects seriously need to be moved to the see also section? Should the article on 1 Ceres never mention 4 Vesta? -- Kheider (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on 2013 FY27. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723191750/http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/asteroids/sizemagnitude.html to http://www.physics.sfasu.edu/astro/asteroids/sizemagnitude.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018154917/http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/dps.html to http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/dps.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Observation arc / first observation date?
Currently it says 7.08 years for an epoch of 27th April 2019; wouldn't that suggest a first observation in March 2012? But everything else points to a first observation/discovery in 2013, with no precovery noted or similar. How do we square this circle? 146.199.60.87 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The first observation (precovery) would be March 2011 and the last observation was April 2018 giving a 7 year arc. The epoch for the current orbit solution is just a point in time used by JPL. JPL will change the epoch every 6 months with or without new observations. -- Kheider (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)