Talk:(Drawing) Rings Around the World/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Promoted
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I was very impressed with the musical structure section. Not being a musician myself I found it easy to understand. Of course, I don't know what F♯ sounds like but I understood the big picture. The only qualm I have is that your weatherman wikilink goes to a disambiguation page rather than an actual article. There's nothing in GA criteria that states you should fail for this but I highly recommend changing that. This would be brought up again if you put this article up for peer review or decided to nominate it for featured article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The everyHit.com source did bother me because of the fact that I had to do a search to fact check your information and since it's a database it made me think of imdb which is generally not accepted as a reliable source in wikipedia. However, since I've never heard anything bad about everyHit.com then I have no reason to deny promotion.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I encourage you to review another article in the Arts category. For some reason the Arts section has a much longer wait list than the other sections. What I like to do is review the shorter articles because they're much easier to review and critique and it helps people. Also, the more I review other people's article the less time it will take for someone else to review mine. Congratulations. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gbern, have fixed the weatherman link. I occasionally do GA reviews but I've been busy at the minute. Cavie78 (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I encourage you to review another article in the Arts category. For some reason the Arts section has a much longer wait list than the other sections. What I like to do is review the shorter articles because they're much easier to review and critique and it helps people. Also, the more I review other people's article the less time it will take for someone else to review mine. Congratulations. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gbern, have fixed the weatherman link. I occasionally do GA reviews but I've been busy at the minute. Cavie78 (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)