Talk:Ålgård Line/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two disambiguations fixed.diff

Linkrot: no dead links found.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is "reasonably well written", I made a small number of copy-edits.diff Complies sufficiently with the MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Online sources check out, I assume good faith for print sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough, whilst remaining focussed on the subject.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Correctly tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk (talk)  20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk (talk)  20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk (talk)  20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)