Talk:Çikatovë e Vjeter

Requested move 19 July 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: ❌ (pmc)  Dr Strauss   talk   18:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Çikatovë e Vjeter → Staro Čikatovo – Gbooks hits: "Staro Čikatovo" is used 7 times more than "Çikatovë e Vjeter" in Gbooks.--Z oupan 22:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  12:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Staro Čikatovo (35): "Staro Cikatovo" (21), "Старо Чикатово" (12), "Staro Čikatovo" (2)
 * Çikatovë e Vjeter (5): "Cikatove e Vjeter" (4), "Çikatovë e Vjeter" (1)


 * ✅ obvious COMMONNAME per google, and per page history. -- Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  21:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose. It is just a village, but it would be better to stay the official name of the settlement.--Liridon (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose Liridon is right. The official name has more Google Books results than other name. Although Zoupan has been asked several times by other editors to not use results in Google Books version in Serbian language they always do the same thing. Çikatovë e Vjeter 9 results and Staro Čikatovo 5 results. I agree it is just a name of a village too. Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It looks like the numbers that Zoupan got from Google Books are wrong. The official name gives more hits than the proposed one. Unless there is another convincing reason, which can't be since it is a simple village and a stub, I don't see why we should promote the change.--Mondiad (talk) 00:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.