Talk:École L'Odyssée/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Si Trew (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I've make what I consider to be uncontentious copy edits as I went along, feel free to revert any of them, they're all here. Si Trew (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Review
GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * One word that is not in any dictionary I have ("semestrial"). "Hockey" should perhaps say "Ice hockey" (in the UK it means grass hockey), I've piped the links but kept it as "hockey" in the text. I've placed French language text in templates. Similarly it might be better not to hide Canadian football under a pipe from "football". It might be worth making explicit that $ means Canadian dollars, at first use, though that should be obvious (i.e. just link $ to Canadian dollar.)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):   (OR):
 * Good refs, but a few (three I think) references to primary source (the school's official website). I'd like to see the refs in a template, although they are well formatted.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The section about AIMS being criticised perhaps does not belong in this article beyond that directly connected with schooling. However, it's short enough I'm not too bothered about it, in the absence of a "Criticisms of AIMS" kind of article.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Collaboration of several editors, no reverts or undos in edit history.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Slight concern on the permission of the soccer team, but it's on Wikimedia Commons, so that's their problem.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Any or all of the copy edits I made could be reverted, and my view that it it would stand as GA. Congratulations, bravo and thank you for your hard work. Si Trew (talk) 06:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Any or all of the copy edits I made could be reverted, and my view that it it would stand as GA. Congratulations, bravo and thank you for your hard work. Si Trew (talk) 06:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the quick review! I'll address these concerns as soon as possible. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  15:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)