Talk:Élisabeth Lévy

Neo-reaction - failed verification
As far as I can tell from that source, it doesn't mention anything about neo-reactionism or 'the neo-reaction'; the only instance of 'neo' is the subject asking a question about neo-Catholicism, as far as I can tell. It is an interview by the article subject of one of the people named; formatting problems within the source even make it hard to tell which bits are the interviewer and which the interviewee. I'm sure the source might be useful for something, but at best using it to support this statement appears to be original research or improper synthesis. SamBC(talk) 12:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I take note of the changes since I added the tags, but a link to one interview doesn't support the claim that she 'specialises' in such interviews; even a large number of such interviews as sources would make that original research. To make a claim like that, you need a reliable source that actually makes that claim. SamBC(talk) 12:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)