Talk:Émile Durkheim/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:  Satisfied that there is sufficiently broad coverage
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: No evidence of edit wars
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: All images have an appropriate tag and are either out of copyright or licensed under CC
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: All images have a suitable caption
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: Pi        (Talk to me!  ) 00:32, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to take a break. I'll be back to finish this in a bit.
 * The reviewer hasn't edited in a month, so a new one will need to be found. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 15:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 21:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)