Talk:Óscar Iván Zuluaga

Scandal claims
Mr Zulagua argued that he was being framed.

If you make a charge against someone (for example that they were recorded discussing an illegal hacking - and how would the recording have taken place?) then there is a moral obligation upon you to mention the defense the person being attacked makes against the charge. Mr Zulagua denies the voice on the recording is his - he publically denied it during the televised Presidential debate. You can not honestly claim you do not know that the man says he is being framed - you are deliberately choosing to leave out his defense.2.124.130.249 (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I have gone ahead and added more information about the scandal as you requested, even though you could have done that yourself. Please assume good faith before you go ahead and start throwing moral obligations and accusing editors of deliberate editing. mijotoba (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)