Talk:× Doritaenopsis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Doritaenopsis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714122501/http://www.aos.org/images/img_content/PDFs/june_newsletter/Beginner_20.pdf to http://www.aos.org/images/img_content/PDFs/june_newsletter/Beginner_20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Synonymy of involved genera
I think this article should be written in the past tense, as in Neofinetia, because it refers to a taxon, that has undergone revision. The involved genera Doritis and Phalaenopsis now refer to the same entity Phalaenopsis. Writing A Doritaenopsis and a Phalaenopsis will appear to the casual observer as the same orchid. is not factually correct, in the sense that it literally is the same genus and it does not only appear that way. It is not an intergeneric, but an interspecific hybrid. Conan Wolff (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The difference is that x Doritaenopsis is a hybrid genus, whereas Neofinetia is, as you say, a synonym of Vanda. But I agree about the coloured sentence, and cannot find it in the source cited. Be BOLD and delete it. Gderrin (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

I started a discussion point, as you had advised me to seek out more discussions. I made these changes now. Conan Wolff (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry "a discussion point"? Where? And what changes? Gderrin (talk) 22:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)