Talk:Škoda Auto

Felicia/Fabia
May i ask what rationale is behind the statement that Fabia is a replacement for Felicia?

Fabia never was a Felicia replacement, as far as i know. If we look at it from a historic point of view, the Favorit competed with Golf II (was the same class and size), but had a production run ~2 years further. Both were "small family cars". Golf II was replaced by Golf III, whereas the Favorit was replaced by the Felicia, as you all know. Both were still "small family cars".

However, Fabia is built on the Polo platform, which is classed as "supermini". Also, Fabia was put on sale a ~year before Felicia was discontinued.

The fact that they are about the same size, does not make them the same class. Fabia is practically a Favorit in disguise and based on a design from 1987, when cars of this size were considered family cars.

Felicia basically does not have a successor, as it would have to be a Golf sized hatchback. The closest is Octavia, which is akin to Jetta/Bora, ergo a Golf with the longer boot. Along the same lines, Fabia has no predecessor.

In conclusion i would like to edit the Skoda auto car timeline to reflect these separate classes and amend the mention that the Fabia is a Felicia replacement.

Perhaps something like this in the Fabia article:

"Although a supermini, Fabia can be considered a successor to the Škoda Felicia, which was discontinued in 2001."

Or is that not suitable? Thoughts?

// Eazy-O —Preceding comment was added at 11:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The octavia is still a hatchback and thus the shape is irrelevant. It is the replacement and even if it were a saloon only car it would still be the replacement as they fall into the same class. the Fabia is not a sucessor of the Felicia because its an entirely different type of vehicle. you arguement is also flawed by the fact the the octavia is a golf underneath and the fact that the borra is in essence the saloon version of the golf and not an entirely different car. (86.31.187.245 (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC))


 * Okay... Let's see.


 * I never mentioned Octavia not being hatchback/liftback, it's however bigger, much like the Bora is bigger than the Golf. The fact that Fabia is not Felicia's successor i quite clear to me, that's exactly what i'm questioning everyone else upon.


 * The fact that the Octavia is based on the Golf platform is, again, quite clear to me, i believe i have mentioned it in the bit which you replied to, but apparently failed to read completely?


 * To be clear, i'm asking to change the timeline and articles, to make it clear that the Fabia is in a smaller class than the Felicia and as such not a replacement for it. At most, i would concede mentioning that the Felicia has no true successor, with Octavia being the closest; and as Felicia was the smallest Škoda during late '90s, this (make's smallest car) role is now taken over by the Fabia. Something along those lines, anyway.


 * Thoughts? Also, please use proper formatting and sign your messages. Thank you.


 * Eazy-O (talk) 12:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Accuracy
Just how many car manufacturers did start out manufacturing bicycles. Needs citation.

Vandalism
1st paragraph seems to have been vandalised.
 * there's also something terribly wrong with 1990's and 2000's section.--Devamech (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Guns?
any ideas on its manufacturing of munitions activities before WWII? I've heard that the czech rep. was a huge munition mftcr...looking for confirmation from some who may know/heard.

Well the Skoda guns were pretty popular, I would assume they were making quite a bit of munitions there as well. Peter Chamberlain

AFAIK, ?koda Octavia was developed on the common basis with VW Golf IV, Audi A3 and probably some Seat and not on the larger basis of VW Passat, Audi A4 etc. --Peterlin 09:37, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * Maybe the Octavia name is used for different models in different places. In the UK, an Octavia is a large family saloon car.  I haven't found any exact information on the chassis but the exterior dimensions of 4,507 mm x 1,920 mm are close to the VW Passat at 4676 mm x 1740 mm. The Mk.4 VW Golf shares a platform with SEAT León, Škoda Fabia and Audi TT amongst others. See the Octavia and Fabia sections of Škoda UK website for more details. akaDruid 12:59, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * In fact Octavia is based on the same chassis than Golf. For more details see Octavia and Golf. As you can see the wheel base is identical (2578 mm) in both (Radstand in Golf's technical data) and wheel track is almost identical too (Spurweite, vorn for front and hinten for rear). For reference, here is the technical data for Passat (wheel base 2709 mm). --84.250.189.193 19:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Hierarchy
The following was deleted without comment. Why?<br. ''The Škoda brand is located at the bottom of the hierarchy of VAG brands: Audi, Volkswagen, SEAT, Škoda.22


 * It was correct to delete the statement because it's meaningless. In what respect is it bottom of the hierarchy? Price, speed, power, quality? No-one knows!
 * As an aside, it would be nice if you were not anonymous, please sign with four tildes(that's the wavy sign, it's 'upper case Hash' on my keyboard.
 * Adrian Pingstone 15:28, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Škoda Works
I think Škoda Works should have a separate article. -- Sandius 20:07, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * It does (I took the liberty of wikilinking your comment). But the person who moved it didn't have enough sense to insert a link here.  Gene Nygaard

Deleted word 'worthless' in description of Škoda. Alexisr 16:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Pronunciation
The pronunciation will not work. 67.188.172.165 04:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The pronunciation should also be given in IPA in line with many other articles in Wikipedia that give pronunciations. -- B.D.Mills  (T, C) 00:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Pronunciations:
 * BrE: /&#712;sk&#601;&#650;d &#601;/, /&#712;&#643;k&#601;&#650;d &#601;/
 * AmE: /&#712;sko&#650;d &#601;/
 * Czech: /&#712;&#643;ko da/ - the &#352; is the phoneme /&#643;/ (sh), not /s/ - see Czech language
 * Reference: Longman Pronunciation Dictionary 2nd edition 2000, J.G.Wells, ISBN 0 582 36467 1. -- B.D.Mills  (T, C) 00:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Interesting...
So, a car company was started because Germans can't read Czech. The world is crazy, I tell you.

Metalex or MTX?
The Melkus PT 73 Spyder was designd with inpiration from something called Škoda Metalex. I managed to find very few pictures and it seems it has MTX markings (but it says Metalex in te rear). Anybody have more info on it? // Liftarn
 * Try this link - --Jklamo 19:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

VW merger - not an improvement in quality/value
I disagree with the following in connection with the VW merger: "Backed by VW know-how and investments the design — both style and engineering — has improved greatly. The 1996 model Felicia was still based on the floor plan of the Favorit, but quality improvements helped and in the Czech Republic the car was as popular as it was value for money."

Regarding the quality: Skoda as one of few manufacturers continues producing spare parts for models as old as 25 years (e.g. Skoda 120). There are many of these cars still in operation in the Czech Republic, which wouldn't be the case if they were anything but very good quality. (e.g. how many Fiats that old are on the roads?) Many Favorits also still exist in the Czech Republic and abroad, despite initial claims in the media that (compared to the older models) this one was so bad that 'it wouldn't last two years'.

Regarding the value for money: New Skoda Favorits in 1990 retailed for 80,000 Czech Crowns (approximately 2500 euro), while costing about 4 times more 3 years later.

If you have references to support these facts then it would be worth adding them I think.


 * Skodas, at least in the UK, always had a better reputation than the offerings from other USSR (Unloved Soviet & Socialist Rubbish) manufacturers but the perception was that quality improved after the VW takeover. Certainly my anecdatal experience from Felicia, Fabia and Roomster ownership is that they were much better screwed together than previous cars i've owned.  Yes, Citröen, I'm looking at you. Mr Larrington (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Company name
I have deleted following section below (named "Company name") from article. I think it's just worthless trivia and don't belong here. Many companies have names meaning something so it's not something extraordinary. it's just a coincidence between founder's name and Czech/Slovak/... word. It could be noted somewhere but definitely not in separate section IMHO.

In Czech, the word 'škoda' means "damage, detriment, disadvantage", and occurs in the stock phrase "to je škoda", which roughly means, "It's a pity". It has the same meaning in several Slavic languages such as Slovak, Slovene, Croatian, Ukrainian and Polish, though in the latter it is spelled 'szkoda'. - Miko3k 10:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I beg to differ. The meaning of the company's name further highlights that this car was intended to be second-rate. It also helps explain why this car make was looked down on for many decades in Czechoslovakia and neighbouring countries. Think of Volkswagen; meaning a people's car. Adolf Hitler intended that car to be suited for the working man. It is only recently that the company has become a luxury marque. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.48.10.6 (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

You should note that the name Skoda actually came from Skoda Works. Skoda Works was a military equipment manufacturer - dont you think that the name Skoda, something like "Damage, Inc." is actually a good name for military equipment manufacturer? :) Besides, the name comes from the last name of Emil Skoda, the company founder, and has nothing to do with quality or market placement of the products. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.96.133.33 (talk) 09:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why was this bit of information regarding Emil Skoda not on the page itself. It makes sense that if a car brand is named after a person that you mention this. I am sure at the page of Opel we will see that Opel was founded by Adam Opel... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.89.37.87 (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Skoda Rapid 136 1988.jpg
Image:Skoda Rapid 136 1988.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Skoda.png
Image:Skoda.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Criticism section
Here's a place for people to discuss the neutrality of the criticism section of this article. Some thoughts of mine while perusing this:
 * 1) It seems to be India-centric. What is the opinion of other Skoda subsidiaries around the world? Are some regions "better" than others?
 * 2) One website referenced frequently is the forums at team-bhp. Is this a reputable website? Should a large section of the criticism section be from their website?
 * 3) The photo didn't seem to reference anything in particular, with reference to the section. One isolated protest might not warrant a picture in the Wikipedia article.

This can be a place for centralized discussion about the section. Please add comments below. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 18:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like one man protest against Skoda? I would remove the whole section... --Typ932 T&middot;C 18:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Typ932, you really should click on those links provided and read them through before concluding that it's a one man protest. I do NOT own a Skoda but regularly see extensive criticism being levelled on Skoda and their callous response; both on the internet and in person.Blacwiki (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Where do you live? I havent heard anything like this about Skoda and Im not sure if this is really Wikipedia stuff at all --Typ932 T&middot;C 16:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I live in India. you should really read completely through everything and then form opinions. but since it's obvious you haven't been doing that, here is a link that details the woes of Skoda India customers. and this is just one site. let me know once you are done reading through it and I'll give you more horror stories to read. if this is not Wikipedia material, I'd be enlightened if you let me know what is. 2.66 valves per cylinder maybe? Blacwiki (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have any news sites, reliable magazine articles or something more realiable than forums or post from invidual skoda owner, I went thry all sources and found any what would be considered as reliable source  ? --Typ932 T&middot;C 18:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I dont think WP:IDONTKNOWIT alone is sufficient grounds for deletion. several links from popular media sites have been given in the criticism section (apart from the forum link) regarding these issues. blacwiki, check out RS to learn more about Sources considered reliable by wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.3.151 (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe popular media sites, but those are post from individual persons... we need well know magazine or similar with decent article, not post made by someone to "mediasite" it almost same as post in forum, it this kind of section is kept we need also see the other side and not just view of one person or couple in India? And is it necessary to have that critism section in the beginning of article?? --Typ932 T&middot;C 19:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please check the referenced links again, they include reports from well known Indian print media sources like The Hindu,The Financial Express, Mumbai Mirror which is a supplement of The Times of India, Mid Day,Autocar India etc. I'm sure these sources meet WP:RS. Regarding the positioning, it appears to be in the middle of the page physically, and towards the end of the textual content. I fail to see where it comes in the beginning.
 * However I'm not sure this section belongs to the Skoda main page, as it has no connection to Skoda Auto itself, apart from the alleged fact that they do not intervene. Maybe a page should be created for Skoda Auto India, and this section moved to that perhaps ??? 59.93.12.144 (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * An article from The New York Times 10 years ago states that Skoda vehicles were thought to be unsafe, even by Skoda's executives. This fact should probably be worked into the article to allow for a greater worldwide perspective, especially because Skoda just recently entered the Indian market, as they were originally a Czech company.
 * With regards to the other sources: ideally, criticism from the present-day would come from similar, reputable news sources, such as The New York Times. While team-bhp may be a source that is popular, well-regarded in India, etc. Reliable source examples states that:
 * "Web forums and the talkback section of weblogs are rarely regarded as reliable. While they are often controlled by a single party (as opposed to the distributed nature of Usenet), many still permit anonymous commentary and we have no way of verifying the identity of a poster. Some however, are edited by reliable organizations, and therefore may possibly be justified as exceptions."
 * I strongly suggest that team-bhp references be removed from the article. I haven't examined the other third-party sources from the online sites of Indian print publications, but I'd be more inclined to accept those as parts of the article rather than the same information given on the team-bhp forums. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 13:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. THe team bhp and consumercomplaints links probably don't meet the criteria. I'd say a summary of this section, along with the references which meet WP:RS be added along with the Skoda Auto India's description in the main article.59.93.2.77 (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

A friend send me a link to the team bhp article and i have been watching it closely. I have also followed other websites talking about skoda services in india. I have further collaborated these stories with friends and patients who are skoda owners. Everyone seems to have the same opinion. I think the criticism section is very valid. As far as team-bhp is concerned, i have researched them as well. I found that they are completely non-biased and in fact do not take any advertisements from car companies so as to reaffirm their neutrality status. In fact, even after such a heated discussion on their forum about skoda, they still display a skoda on their masthead; thereby proving that their cars are great, it's just the service issue that needs to be addressed. One man may have started the protest, but there are a lot of skoda owners who have joined in. I don't think this section should be removed, rather let it serve as an eye-opener for future skoda buyers as well as a place where current owners can pen their feedback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejas Kothari (talk • contribs) 09:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Ian, to address your thoughts: thanks, Blacwiki (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) the article is indeed India centric because that's where I live. Right now, Skoda has manufacturing presence and markets in Europe and India. while the quality of the cars is undisputable - as I mentioned in the section -, it is the service and support in India that has drawn a lot of criticism. mistreating customers is the norm in India. if companies pulled the same stunts elsewhere, they would have been tarred and feathered almost instantly but not in India, thanks to the extremely slow moving judicial system.
 * 2) team-bhp.com is a very reputable forum and officially a big board. it is probably the largest single repository of unified automotive information in India. it does not run advertisements to sustain itself. regarding the paragraph about Skoda threatening to "instigate" people in lawsuits, I have screenshots link1 link2 link3 of their membership requests on team-bhp.com which establish beyond a doubt that the member represents Skoda on that forum. threatening people who are sharing their experiences with legal action is a clear attempt to trample free speech and is not something I think should be allowed to slip.
 * 3) the photo was an example of a protesting Skoda owner. I also have photographs of the car in question that met with an accident because of malpractice by the Skoda service center. would you accept that photo?
 * 4) on a different note, the very same dealer - who was forced to close down - has started another service center under a different name. as they say, it happens only in India.
 * Even though you do live in India, in an attempt to make this article more balanced, perhaps attempt to find other comments regarding the European level of service. Obviously, no one can force you to do anything you aren't necessarily passionate about, but the worldwide tag will stick around provided that European critiques (positive or negative) of Skoda are not addressed.
 * See my comments above, especially Reliable source examples.
 * Wikipedia strongly cautions against conducting original research. In fact, this section of WP:NOR indicates that primary-source photographs may only be used if a reputable third party reliably publishes such photographs, and even then, they must be used with extreme caution. Therefore, unless this single car protest was documented by reputable news organizations, it should be removed. Let's say that one person decides to protest a controversial issue. I take a photograph of that person. Should I upload that photograph to Wikipedia and add it to the article that most closely relates to that issue? Looking at the above guidelines, the answer would be an unequivocal "no."
 * (Warning: My personal opinion) I think it's unreasonable to assume that a company can have equal service across all of its affiliates. Services, by their very nature, are intangible and are tough to duplicate. Should Skoda have better quality control with regards of who to approve as an affiliate? Maybe, but I think this might be more of a matter of a few bad apples spoiling the barrel. Would Skoda like to have the best quality across all of its affiliates, from the largest to the smallest? Absolutely, but again, trying to duplicate a level of service across many affiliates is very difficult, especially for a company that has its headquarters in another continent. I don't find the lack of intervention by the Czech headquarters of Skoda to be surprising. Czech Skoda's reasoning is that they have a specific division that is dedicated to dealing with Indian Skoda Auto sales (Skoda Auto India). They trust their Indian executives to make the responsible decisions, based on their expertise in the region, and figure they need not be held responsible by the poor decisions of their subdivision. It could be an indication to change for the future, but they can attribute the blame to the Indian division. I think I'm going in circles now, but I think I've made myself (somewhat) clear. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 13:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Ian, I understand your concerns about the notability of team-bhp.com and will keep those references out of the article. I will also shortly remove the entire criticism section once I am decided on how to merge these facts with the rest of the article.
 * in my personal opinion - and this is not meant to be an attempt to justify uncommenting the commented sections - it is indeed unrealistic to assume that standards of service will be the same throughout the world. but if I was buying a car worth almost 1.5 million INR, I would expect service to be mediocre at worst and stellar at best. I certainly would not expect a dealer - who has been authorized by the manufacturer - to relieve my car of critical parts and replace them with dangerous fakes. despite being made aware of this, Skoda continues to fight a legal battle instead of doing the right thing that is to apologize and replace his car. this is one case that has received extensive coverage throughout the internet. I have personally seen friends of mine - all Skoda customers - being treated like liabilities at at least three different authorized service centers. similar experiences are also being reported all the time on a lot of forums. there is no smoke without a fire. Skoda India definitely has its affiliate selection process wrong.
 * until I suitably merge the contents of that section with the rest of the article, could the section run with the tags is currently carries, and could SkodaIndia be prevented from making further disruptive edits?Blacwiki (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The tags can stay there as long as it is necessary. Skodaindia does not have any restrictions imposed on their editing, as of right now. I don't anticipate a block being necessary. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 13:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Skodaindia appears to have attempted a disruptive edit in the section again and seems to have deleted the rest of the entire page. can someone revert the edits and rescue the page ? 59.93.12.144 (talk) 07:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Skodaindia has tried to muddle the page again despite a warning. this time it led to a broken reference tag that caused the rest of the page not to render. SkodaIndia has also changed the content of the section to try and indicate that the two court cases - one in Mumbai and one in Delhi, both by different claimants - are two instances of the same case!! the parts swap in the first instance is NOT an allegation; it is a fact confirmed to the newspaper by a Skoda employee. the frantic attempts by SkodaIndia to subvert this article and threaten people on a forum meant for free speech are by themselves admissions of guilt.Blacwiki (talk) 08:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * If by "a forum meant for free speech" you mean Wikipedia then you're mistaken. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This article currently assigns undue weight to criticisms which have not significantly impacted popular perception of the subject; this will eventually need to be corrected. The whole criticisms section will eventually need to be removed; if any of it is important enough to be retained, it will be integrated into the article as a whole. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Chris, by 'a forum meant for free speech' I meant team-bhp.com where members have been threatened with lawsuits for sharing customer service experiences. SkodaIndia began by trying to delete the whole section outright and then tried to manipulate factual statements in that section. so far, Skoda has nothing but its word to refute any of the references that were made. what does this tell you about them? 'popular perception' is a very hazy concept which differs in different places. I have attempted to describe popular perception where I live. if the content of that section is merged with the rest of the article to remove excessive bias, so be it, but these facts deserve a mention somewhere. Blacwiki (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Not when this results on the article being heavily skewed towards one particular demographic. Nothing "deserves" to be on Wikipedia; it may be included if that is the consensus, but it also may not. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Is there any reliable well known magazine reference or similar to these claims?, I went thru all the sources and found nothing all those are made by individual forum posters --Typ932 T&middot;C 17:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I've gone through the criticism section and double-checked the sources. Most were unreliable or misleading, so I've commented those out. Once again, we need reliable sources if the information presented is to remain the article. Let me know what people think of the new version. If it's okay with everyone, after a few days, I will remove the portions I've commented out to clean up the section when viewed in the "edit" window. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 13:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Now that there's a Škoda India article has been created, I have removed the criticism section from this article and have moved it there. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 11:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Operating Profit
Operating profit 200-odd billion? That can't be; is it supposed to be million, maybe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.127.8.25 (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Obviously as it's a company based in Czech Republic that figure is in Kc.--ЗAНИA talk talk] 16:06, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Laurin & Klement
Why is Laurin & Klement car models in Skoda page, these are made before Skoda bought the company, in my opinion they dont belong to this page, there is also own Laurin & Klement article in wikipedia. Škoda Auto is not founded as the infobox says "1895 as Laurin & Klement", the Skoda auto was formed in 1924 after Skoda works bought the Laurin and Klement. You could say Skoda auto was founded as Skoda Works in 1859-- >Typ932 T·C 15:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Any opinions of this?. There are other companies also which dont count their history like this -- >Typ932 T&middot;C 15:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Skoda made cars before the L&K merger, ie Skoda Hispano-Suiza. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.89.37.87 (talk) 13:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Citigo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
 * What should I do?
 * If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
 * If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
 * If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Deal with problem editors as such, instead of protecting page, or even tiny grammar edits become a hassle
Please remove the unnecessary comma from "Rear of a Škoda Popular Special, on display at the Sportauto Museum" in image caption. Or better yet, unprotect the page so we don't have to make requests like this for trivial edits. Both of the editwarriors on this page 3RR'd the same day, back to back, and could have been blocked for it. There is no need for page protection, much less for weeks and weeks, as the page is not attracting vandalism, nor even seeing any editwarring except between two individuals who can be dealt with as individuals. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 05:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

What about the Rapid, Yeti, Roomster, Citigo?
DilbertsDog (talk) 13:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

need help
I need help from an expert or a wikipedian for the skoda 130 photo. (It is in section post world war II, oh and please put text in!) Written by 174.60.119.235 (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Skoda Octavia IV combi.jpg

Does We Have to add new Skoda NFT Project?
With due respect to the editors,

Could we have to add a new topic to the Skoda Wikipedia page regarding the "Skodaverse India" project. It involves Skoda's exploration of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) in the blockchain and cryptocurrency domain.

Reference: https://www.skoda-auto.co.in/news/news-detail/skoda-auto-enters-the-realm-of-nfts-with-skodaverse-india Tarunmahajanantier (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)


 * It doesn't seem that notable to me. Opok2021 (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Opok2021 ok no worries Nick Winsley (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

The Skoda Logo in the infobox is unsourced and appears to be incorrect
The logo (apparently since 2022), is unsourced and according to the Skoda website (https://www.skoda-auto.com/world/logo-history), the logo in the infobox is the same logo Skoda (L&K) used from 1905-1929. The current logo is also shown on the website. Could someone show me sources for this or it will have to be changed to the current logo. Opok2021 (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)